2012
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Stone Migration with the Accordion During Endoscopic Ureteral Lithotripsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A randomized prospective trial of 23 patients with distal ureteric calculi found that the device caused significantly less retrograde migration during fragmentation with an impact lithotripter. 15 Wu et al conducted a retrospective review of 235 patients with ureteric calculi treated with and without the Accordion as well as laser lithotripsy. 16 The device did not result in a significant reduction fluoroscopy time or operating time, but did produce a significantly higher stone free rate.…”
Section: Cuaj -Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized prospective trial of 23 patients with distal ureteric calculi found that the device caused significantly less retrograde migration during fragmentation with an impact lithotripter. 15 Wu et al conducted a retrospective review of 235 patients with ureteric calculi treated with and without the Accordion as well as laser lithotripsy. 16 The device did not result in a significant reduction fluoroscopy time or operating time, but did produce a significantly higher stone free rate.…”
Section: Cuaj -Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS)) with affiliated morbidities and health-care costs have been reported [2, 7, 8]. Novel stone retrieval devices have been introduced to address the problem of accidental stone migration: Stone baskets [9, 10], suction devices [11], balloon catheters [12, 13] guidewire [1416] and gel-based devices [17, 18] significantly reduced the incidence of stone retropulsion. On the contrary, these devices are associated with additional costs and some of them with a higher risk for ureteral injuries [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ursiny M and Eisner BH, studied the cost-effectiveness of the use of stone retropulsion barrier tools during urethroscopic lithotripsy in 2013 at Harvard University and stated that due to the assessment of these tools' costs and the cost of secondary actions due to stone retropulsion, the use of a barrier tool that prevents stone retropulsion during urethroscopic lithotripsy is more than 6.6% cost-effective [13]. although most of this tools have limitations that prevent their routine use during ureteroscopic lithotripsy treatment [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%