2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of the selection of resistant Staphylococcus aureus by moxifloxacin plus doxycycline in an in vitro dynamic model: an additive effect of the combination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose the combination of doxycycline with levofloxacin because our patient was immunocompromised. Fluoroquinolones are bactericidal antibiotics that are frequently active against Mycoplasma hominis (17), a pathogen phylogenetically related to Spiroplasma; no antagonism has been described for the combination; and an additive effect in vitro against certain infections was even found (18). The clinical and microbiological resolution in our patient suggests that this regimen might be a suitable therapeutic alternative for serious systemic infections, although further clinical experience is needed to confirm our observation.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…We chose the combination of doxycycline with levofloxacin because our patient was immunocompromised. Fluoroquinolones are bactericidal antibiotics that are frequently active against Mycoplasma hominis (17), a pathogen phylogenetically related to Spiroplasma; no antagonism has been described for the combination; and an additive effect in vitro against certain infections was even found (18). The clinical and microbiological resolution in our patient suggests that this regimen might be a suitable therapeutic alternative for serious systemic infections, although further clinical experience is needed to confirm our observation.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Likewise, the failure of vancomycin MPCs to be significantly lowered when combined with levofloxacin or rifampicin might also result from the lower concentrations of levofloxacin and rifampicin used in combination (levofloxacin and rifampicin are both concentrationdependent antibiotics). The reason for such a phenomenon was unanimously explained as an emergence of cross resistance by Zhanel et al 32 and Firsov et al 33 Here, we give a possible explanation from another perspective. Theoretically speaking, two-step mutations would be required for mutant growth once both drugs are kept above MIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Surprisingly, vancomycin in combination with rifampicin (2 or 4 mg ml À1 ) or levofloxacin (2 mg ml À1 ) did not lead to significant lowering of the isolates' vancomycin MPCs in general. According to Zhanel et al 32 and Firsov et al, 33 the MPC of an antibiotic could not be lowered when combined with a partner at a relatively lower concentration. Likewise, the failure of vancomycin MPCs to be significantly lowered when combined with levofloxacin or rifampicin might also result from the lower concentrations of levofloxacin and rifampicin used in combination (levofloxacin and rifampicin are both concentrationdependent antibiotics).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other values are 0.008-0.031 lg/mL for Chlamydia pecorum (Pudjiatmoko et al, 1998); <0.5 lg/mL for Pasteurella haemolytica (Ole-Mapenay and Mitema, 1997); 0.06-2 lg/ mL for Mycoplasma mycoides (Egwu and Aliyu, 1998) and 0.1 lg/mL for Bacillus anthracis (Brook et al, 2001). MIC values determined in human isolates were 0.016-0.5 lg/mL for Streptococcus pneumoniae (Zhanel et al, 2003, andRoss andJones, 2004); 0.064 mg/mL for Chlamydia psittaci (Suchland et al, 2003); 0.12-0.5 lg/mL for Staphylococcus aureus (Firsov et al, 2004;Ross and Jones, 2004); 0.5 lg/mL for Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Waites et al, 2003) and 1 lg/mL for Haemophilus influenzae (Koeth et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%