1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91880-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Wound Infection in Abdominal Operations by Peroperative Antibiotics or Povidone- Iodine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second article was excluded due to lack of a control group, thus not meeting our criteria for a RCT [17]. Three articles were excluded for enrolling both elective and emergent abdominal operations, for which the data could not be differentiated [1, 11, 18]. Harihara et al used PVI topically on the skin rather than the subcutaneous tissue [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second article was excluded due to lack of a control group, thus not meeting our criteria for a RCT [17]. Three articles were excluded for enrolling both elective and emergent abdominal operations, for which the data could not be differentiated [1, 11, 18]. Harihara et al used PVI topically on the skin rather than the subcutaneous tissue [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative wound infection is the most common complication following abdominal operations [1]. Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for 40% of nosocomial infections among surgical patients [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of these were excluded: a congress abstract18 later published in an article included in the meta‐analysis, one lacking the required data19, and one that compared both shaving and irrigation but without detailed data20. Fifteen of the remaining studies which were graded as having a low risk of bias were included in the main analysis21–35, and nine graded as having a moderate risk of bias were included only in the sensitivity analysis36–44. Owing to the nature of irrigation, blinding of surgeons was not possible, but wound assessment was evaluated blind in seven of the 15 articles included in the main analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…form part of the commensal flora of the mouth, gut and female genital tract. Bacteroides has been increasingly recognized as a pathogen in wounds and after abdominal surgery where contamination with gut organisms is the probable source of infection (Finegold, 1974;Feathers et al, 1977;Griffiths et al, 1976;Galland et al, 1977). Fusobacterium is occasionally pathogenic in these situations, but its role in causing a wide variety of necrotic lesions (necrobacillosis) in man (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At post-mortem examination, the right cerebral hemisphere was covered with foul-smelling, thick, yellowish pus which was mainly in the subdural space but also in the subarachnoid space (Fig. 1) (Finegold, 1974;Feathers et al, 1977;Griffiths et al, 1976;Galland et al, 1977). Fusobacterium is occasionally pathogenic in these situations, but its role in causing a wide variety of necrotic lesions (necrobacillosis) in man (e.g.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%