2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0876-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventive Parenting Interventions: Advancing Conceptualizations of Participation and Enhancing Reach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a quarter of participants who did not attend expressed that a higher cash incentive may have motivated them to do so. Cash incentives in intervention attendance have been discussed previously in the literature, 47 and certainly much research finds cash incentives important in obtaining survey participants. 48,49 Nonetheless, these findings were somewhat disappointing because cash incentives are expensive, and thus requiring these incentives dramatically reduces program sustainability.…”
Section: Intervention Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a quarter of participants who did not attend expressed that a higher cash incentive may have motivated them to do so. Cash incentives in intervention attendance have been discussed previously in the literature, 47 and certainly much research finds cash incentives important in obtaining survey participants. 48,49 Nonetheless, these findings were somewhat disappointing because cash incentives are expensive, and thus requiring these incentives dramatically reduces program sustainability.…”
Section: Intervention Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our measurement of the dependent variable was limited to attendance. Although facilitators and observers reported high levels of family engagement in the program sessions, a more fine-grained measure of family participation in program sessions and responses to program material may be associated with different predictors (Mauricio et al, 2018). Another limitation is that we were unable to reach many families to understand why they did not attend sessions, so data on those barriers are anecdotal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, recruiting and retaining families in such programs, especially those requiring in-person attendance, has been a real-world implementation challenge (Spoth & Redmond, 2000;Spoth et al, 2013). Participation in family-focused prevention programs is frequently low (Mauricio et al, 2018), and military families are no exception to this (Aronson et al, 2018). The unique challenges military families face, including long-term parent-child separations, combat-related stress and mental health problems, and frequent relocations are all potential barriers to program participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample sizes and low number of studies that have analyzed SFP (10-14) adoption, reach, and sustainability clearly demonstrate that much remains to be done to understand how the program will perform under a large-scale implementation and transferred to social policies and systems. It is crucial to build capacity in order to favor reach (Mauricio et al, 2018 ), support systems-oriented scaling up of SFP (10-14) or other evidence-based preventive interventions (*Spoth, Rohrbach, et al, 2013 ; Spoth, Trudeau, et al, 2013 ), mainly in scarce resources settings (Mejía et al, 2019 ). This aligns with the state-of-the-art in prevention science, in general (Fishbein et al, 2016 ; *Spoth, Rohrbach, et al, 2013 ; Spoth, Trudeau, et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type 2 Translation “involves the translation of program development to implementation (i.e., efficacy trials with emphasis on internal validity and effectiveness trials with emphasis on internal and external validity)” (Fishbein, Ridenour, Stahl, & Sussman, 2016 , p. 7) and helps establish evidence-based interventions (Fishbein et al, 2016 ). However, it is one of the most deprived targets in the field of prevention science (Spoth, Rohrbach, et al, 2013 ; Spoth, Trudeau, et al, 2013 ) and family and parental programs, in particular (Mauricio, Gonzales, & Sandler, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%