2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01628-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More interestingly, when comparing their results with an earlier TC horizontal reading experiment (Tsai et al, 2012), vertical reading showed a smaller identical preview effect (40 ms vs. 29 ms for horizontal and vertical reading, respectively). Because a larger identical preview effect demonstrates that more parafoveal information has been processed during previous fixations (e.g., Henderson & Ferreira, 1990; Inhoff et al, 1989; Pan & Yan, 2022), previous results have hinted at a larger perceptual span for horizontal than for vertical TC reading. Osaka and Oda (1991) tested the vertical perceptual spans of Japanese readers based on rather small samples of readers ( N = 4) and items ( N = 18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…More interestingly, when comparing their results with an earlier TC horizontal reading experiment (Tsai et al, 2012), vertical reading showed a smaller identical preview effect (40 ms vs. 29 ms for horizontal and vertical reading, respectively). Because a larger identical preview effect demonstrates that more parafoveal information has been processed during previous fixations (e.g., Henderson & Ferreira, 1990; Inhoff et al, 1989; Pan & Yan, 2022), previous results have hinted at a larger perceptual span for horizontal than for vertical TC reading. Osaka and Oda (1991) tested the vertical perceptual spans of Japanese readers based on rather small samples of readers ( N = 4) and items ( N = 18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here, we focus on Chinese. Chinese is visually dense, with most words comprising one or two-characters [6]. As a result, upcoming words fall closer to fixation [7], allowing for more extensive extraction of parafoveal information [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%