Previous COVID-19 infection, but not Long-COVID, is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination

Raw, Rachael K.; Kelly, Clive; Rees, Jon; Wroe, Caroline; Chadwick, David

doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.035

Cited by 26 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Eight-hundred-and-eighteen HCWs responded to both questionnaires, 138 to first only, and 372 to second only, yielding 2146 responses (thus providing complete data) after receiving dose-one or dose-two of BNT162b/Pfizer vaccine. A proportion of participants only provided dose-two data, because some of these respondents had already completed a survey after dose-one in an earlier study [8] . The participants in the present study included (i) people who had already given dose-one data and were happy to later provide dose-two data, and (ii) newly recruited participants providing dose-one and dose-two data, not previously published elsewhere.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…COVID-19 status was determined using the following criteria; (i) lab data confirmed positive-PCR AND/OR antibody-positive COVID-19 history, (ii) lab data confirmed negative-PCR AND/OR antibody-negative COVID-19 history, and (iii) COVID-19 history could not be confirmed with lab data, as data unavailable. Overall AE-related morbidity was measured with a composite score for total symptom number and severity (equal to the sum of number by duration scores), as previously published [8] . Individual and composite scores were compared between doses, for those with and without a prior COVID-19, and between doses.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies found that systemic AEs after mRNA vaccination in seropositive individuals, were greater than in those with no prior COVID-19 [4] , [5] , [6] ; another reported that 532/ 2002 participants with previous infection had increased AEs after either mRNA or vector-based (AZD1222/AstraZeneca) vaccine [7] . Finally, a study we conducted showed that prior COVID-19 was associated with increased AEs following first doses of BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination [8] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…What is still unclear, however, is whether factors such as gender and the presence of ongoing COVID-19 symptoms (OCS) [12] influence reactogenicity between- doses. For example, women and younger people tend to mount a greater immune response to vaccination [11] , which may explain greater AEs in these groups [8] , [13] . Also, it is unknown whether a delayed administration of the second dose, as has occurred in the UK (delivered 3mths post first dose), has any impact on AEs [14] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Prior COVID-19 infection is associated with increased Adverse Events (AEs) after the first, but not the second, dose of the BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccine

Raw

Rees

Kelly

et al. 2022

Vaccine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The BNT162b2/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has been widely used in the UK, particularly amongst healthcare workers (HCWs). To establish whether previous COVID-19 influenced vaccine-associated Adverse Events (AEs), we conducted a survey-based study of HCWs in Northeast England. Out of 1238 HCWs, 32% self-reported prior positive PCR and/or antibody test for SARS-CoV-2. Post-dose AEs were worse in those with prior COVID-19 after the first, but not the second dose of vaccine. Second dose AEs were greater in frequency/severity, regardless of COVID-19 history, and they were more systemic in nature. Women and younger HCW were more likely to report AEs after both doses, while dosing interval had no effect on AEs. Ongoing Symptomatic COVID-19 was associated with greater frequency/severity of AEs after dose 2, but not dose one. Overall, AEs were self-limiting and short-lived (i.e.,<48 hours) in nature. These findings have implications for vaccine hesitancy and informing guidelines for recommended dosing protocols.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Prior COVID-19 infection is associated with increased Adverse Events (AEs) after the first, but not the second, dose of the BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccine

Raw

Rees

Kelly

et al. 2022

Vaccine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Delta viral load was similar) 342 On the other hand, previous COVID-19 infection, is associated with increased severe adverse events following vaccination with Pfizer: headache, fatigue, myalgia, lymphadenopathy, etc. 343 Why did the CDC, the WHO and many public health experts like Fauci, say people who've previously been infected still should get vaccinated? Why did the social networks (twitter, Facebook) and fact checkers censor opposing science-based view without any scientific evidence?…”

Section: Waning Immunitymentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID cure or perpetual vaccination?: 30 cheap effective treatments of COVID-19 & variants, like ivermectin, or never-ending compulsory injection, with unsafe, genotoxic, infertilizing, injuring, crippling, handicapping, lethal, inefficient, ineffective, abortion-tainted, abortive, unethical, experimental genetic-hacks, deceivingly called vaccines instead of haccines? Scientific proof of the COVID PLANdemic with 2000 peer reviewed published references.

Nazar¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is 10x more lethal than COVID-19? Viral covidiocy. 9 out of 10 COVID deaths were vaccinated in Argentina, where case fatality rate was 1300% higher for the vaccinated than for the unvaccinated, plus a higher 40% contagion rate (5% if unvaccinated): the opposite of the narrative. Though not as drastic, Israel, UK, Chile, Uruguay and the USA, also showed worse outcomes for the vaccinated than the unvaxxed, because of different natural evolution of variant waves, periods, treatments and vaccine brands. COVID waves seem to have receded due to the increase of herd immunity of the recovered, both vaccinated and unvaccinated.In the USA and Europe, 5 million adverse reactions and 70 thousand deaths were reported linked to COVID vaccines. Informed consent forms can’t protect COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers against legal actions, even under immunity by law, not only because they are not really “vaccines” but gene hacks to produce the S1 spike protein (or parts), nor because some or all the elements are secret, un-disclosed or hidden, but especially, because the cure had been found, voiding Emergency Use Authorization (EUA): if you get COVID, especially if vaccinated, follow this successful evidence-based treatment: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ ( translations: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/translations/ ). Yet, there are many other options in this document.This research is not “anti-vaccine”, but pro-sane-vaccines. Unlike insane vaccines, it stands for evidence based medicine, i.e. scientifically proven safe and effective treatments. 500 scientific citations prove a systemic bias against cheap effective cures and towards unethical, ineffective and/or unsafe vaccines.Among dozens of effective treatments here reviewed, ivermectin is the best mass cure for COVID-19 variants. It had been scientifically proven beyond any reasonable doubt by May 2020, yet, instead of informing the public about the amazing results and going back to normal, there was a global scheme to block lifesaving information and promote lock downs, masks, restrictions, experimental vaccines and passports.1 million dollars of ivermectin would end the pandemic compared to 160 thousand million dollars PER YEAR to keep a perpetual endemic disease, with vaccines always chasing new variants in a never ending lucrative arms race. It is not a matter of unsettled science: there are more RCT studies than for any other standard-of-care treatment. An insane “war on bugs” by legal drug cartels?With COVID vaccines, Governments have turned a medical act into an administrative mandate. Yet, not a single medical association protested against this violation of the right of the physician to practice medicine, i.e. a customized treatment according to the best knowledge/possibilities?Human rights continue to be systematically violated: to life, to informed consent, to fertility, to ethical treatments (where benefits are higher than harms), to healthcare (instead of sickening-care), to treatments for vaccine injuries, to compensation for injuries and death, to privacy (passes), to freedom (to work, move, assemble, worship), etc.This research presents scientific evidence for a planned global genocide: COVID lab creation, vital information cover-up, deadly recommendations, COVID cure censorship and lethal disinformation to promote dangerous vaccines, which are the worst medical and epidemiological solution to the plandemic:MAY A PERSON :WITHCOVIDVACCINATIONWITHEFFECTIVETREATMENTAVOID GETTING SICK FROM COVID?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID INFECTING OTHERS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID HOSPITALIZATION?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID DYING FROM COVID?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID SIDE-EFFECTS LIKE INFERTILITY, MISCARRIAGE, DISABILITY OR DEATH?🗴 No✓ YesGET HEALTHCARE OR MANUFACTURER LIABILITY FOR INJURIES, DEATH OR NEGLIGENCE?🗴 No✓ YesHELP PROTECT OTHERS?🗴 No✓ YesHELP REDUCE THE SATURATION OF THE HEALTH SYSTEM?🗴 No✓ YesGENERATE HERD IMMUNITY?🗴 No✓ YesHELP TO END THE PANDEMIC?🗴 No✓ YesREDUCE THE GENERATION AND SPREAD OF VARIANTS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID COOPERATION WITH VACCINES PRODUCED WITH ABORTION CELL LINES?🗴 No✓ YesGIVE INFORMED CONSENT WITH A PACKAGE INSERT LISTING ALL THE INGREDIENTS?🗴 No✓ YesAVOID UNDISCLOSED GENE-HACKING, NANO-TAMPERING AND BLUETOOTH CHIP?🗴 No✓ YesFrom the systematic genocide of abortion, they moved on to the COVID genocide of the elderly blocking effective treatment, and then, to the mass genocide with experimental vaccines, starting with the elderly and ending with the babies, even the unborn (vaccinating the pregnants). The genocidal trend didn’t change, only the target population. Same serial killers, different weapons.Hosea 4:6 “My people are dying for lack of knowledge...”

show abstract

Stellenwert der COVID-19-Impfung im Kontext von Long-COVID

Bauernfeind

Schmidt

2022

Innere Medizin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In diesem Beitrag-Postulierte Pathophysiologie von Impfung und Long-COVID -COVID-19-Impfung zur Prävention von Long-COVID Impfung vor SARS-CoV-2-Infektion • Impfung vor und/oder nach SARS-Co-V-2-Infektion -COVID-19-Impfung als therapeutische Option bei Long-COVID -Resümee QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen Zusammenfassung Strategien zum Umgang mit Long-COVID (COVID "coronavirus disease") sind bislang nicht verfügbar. Eine der aktuell geprüften Optionen ist die COVID-19-Impfung, sowohl präventiv als auch therapeutisch. Die Bewertung der vorhandenen Studien ist durch uneinheitliche Definitionen erschwert. Es gibt jedoch Hinweise, dass die (vollständige) COVID-19-Impfung nicht nur die symptomatische Infektion verhindern kann, sondern auch das Risiko für Long-COVID bei Durchbruchinfektionen zu reduzieren vermag. Bei Patienten mit Long-COVID führt die anschließende (einfache und/oder zweifache) COVID-19-Impfung teilweise zu einer Symptommodifikation, die bisweilen nur passager ist. Ein therapeutischer Effekt kann aus der vorliegenden Evidenz allerdings nicht sicher abgeleitet werden. Schlüsselwörter Long-COVID-Prävention • Long-COVID-Therapie • COVID-19-Impfung • Durchbruchsinfektion • "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2" (SARS-CoV-2) Keywords Long COVID/prevention • Long COVID/therapy • COVID-19 vaccination • Breakthrough infection • "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2" (SARS-CoV-2)

show abstract

Previous COVID-19 infection, but not Long-COVID, is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination

Cited by 26 publications

References 8 publications

Prior COVID-19 infection is associated with increased Adverse Events (AEs) after the first, but not the second, dose of the BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccine

Prior COVID-19 infection is associated with increased Adverse Events (AEs) after the first, but not the second, dose of the BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccine

Stellenwert der COVID-19-Impfung im Kontext von Long-COVID

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About