Previous Knee Injury and Health-Related Quality of Life in Collegiate Athletes

Lam, Kenneth C.; Thomas, Steven; Valier, Alison R. Snyder; McLeod, Tamara C. Valovich; Bay, R. Curtis

doi:10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.01

Cited by 34 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the present study, 45% of participants needed more than 4 weeks to recover after their knee injuries and they were unable to return to their level of activity prior to the injury, others needed less time to recover. In comparison with other studies that reported decrease in the ability of some patients to carry out their previous level of physical activity even after they were cleared by their healthcare providers [49,50]. Knee injury is a wellknown risk factor for the development of early knee osteoarthritis [51,52].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Prevalence of knee injuries among male college students in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The knee is considered the most common injured joint between young sport participants. However, there is lack of proper prevalence estimation in our population. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of knee injuries among male college students and to observe the demographic data associated with it. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the awareness and knowledge about these injuries. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. A survey was distributed to collect the data among male college students, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Out of 688 students who participated and completed the questionnaire, a total of 482 were considered valid and met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results: The overall prevalence of knee injury was 23.2% (n = 112). Most of them injured during sport activities especially soccer and 68.7% involved in a non-contact mechanism of injury. Among those who went to a hospital mostly were diagnosed as contusion (31.4%) then as meniscus tear, ACL, and collateral ligament injury, respectively. Majority was treated conservatively and only 10.7% needed surgery surprisingly. There was no statistically significant difference between those who are injured and whether they were warmed up and stretched or not (P = 0.619). Low level of knowledge about knee injuries was noticed among the participants 57.7%. Conclusion: Our study has highlighted the high prevalence of knee injuries and the need to raise the level of awareness and knowledge about these injuries in our population. Soccer was the most common sport associated with knee injuries; most of these injuries were treated conservatively.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Prevalence of knee injuries among male college students in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evaluating the domains of disablement and dimensions of HRQOL that are affected after injury is essential to providing comprehensive athletic health care and helps to ensure that attention to the health condition extends beyond impairments. Authors investigating how musculoskeletal [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and head [30][31][32] injuries affected patients found that deficits were reported across a broad spectrum of health categories and beyond impairments and physical function. These results highlight the need for PRO instruments to capture the whole-person perspective of health in order to better guide patient care decisions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This multidimensional health construct is evaluated by the patient and encompasses a variety of health areas, such as psychological, physical, and social health. [15][16][17][18][19] Additionally, HRQOL can be influenced by events, such as injury [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ; thus, it should be a focus of patient care, especially when evaluating and managing the condition. Recently, the National Athletic Trainers' Association adopted the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) disablement model for the profession.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Disablement Model and Health-Related Quality of Life Classification for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments

Valier

Bacon

Lam

2018

Journal of Athletic Training

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context The National Institutes of Health created a medical research road map that included the development of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). A key feature of PROMIS was the development of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) addressing various aspects of health. Understanding disablement dimensions and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains captured through PROMIS measures will help with instrument selection. Objective To evaluate the pediatric PROMIS PROs and determine the areas of disablement and HRQOL captured within each instrument. Design Descriptive laboratory study. Setting Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants Twenty-two pediatric PROMIS instruments (19 short forms and 3 profiles). Main Outcome Measure(s) Three raters independently reviewed the PROMIS instruments and categorized each question on each instrument according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health disablement model domains (body functions and structures, activity, participation, environmental factors, personal factors) and HRQOL (psychological, physical, social, spiritual, economic) dimensions. A consensus process determined the final question category. The frequencies of disablement model domains and HRQOL dimensions captured by questions on PROMIS instruments were reported. Results The most frequently reported disablement model domain was body function and structure, which was captured by questions in 16/22 (73%) pediatric PROMIS instruments, followed by activity (13/22 [59%] pediatric PROMIS instruments) and participation (9/22 [41%] pediatric PROMIS instruments). The most frequently captured HRQOL dimensions were physical and psychological health, both evaluated in 13/22 (59%) of the pediatric PROMIS instruments. The social dimension of HRQOL was assessed in 9/22 (41%) of the pediatric PROMIS instruments. Conclusions Pediatric PROMIS fixed-length instruments captured a variety of disablement domains and health dimensions, but, like most PRO instruments, no single PROMIS instrument captured them all. Clinicians and researchers must consider their goals when selecting PRO instruments, which may require implementing multiple instruments and those beyond PROMIS.

show abstract

“…There is a paucity of literature on using the SF-12 in a physically active population with musculoskeletal injury. 24 Statistical Analysis. Descriptive statistics, including the median and interquartile range, were calculated for all variables.…”

Section: Instrumentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Among 3 Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Patients With Lower Extremity Health Conditions

Hoch

Lorete

Legner

2019

Journal of Athletic Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context Generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are designed to capture health-related quality-of-life outcomes and to determine treatment effectiveness from the patient's perspective. Multiple generic PROs are used in clinical practice, and an investigation of the psychometric properties of these instruments in a high-functioning, physically active population is important for the future use of these instruments. Objective To determine the relationship among 3 generic PROs: the modified Disablement in the Physically Active (mDPA) Scale, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and the Short Form 12 (SF-12) in physically active patients seeking treatment for a lower extremity health condition. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Athletic training clinical facility, physical therapy clinic. Patients or Other Participants One hundred patients seeking rehabilitation services for a lower extremity health condition. Main Outcome Measure(s) All patients completed a demographic questionnaire and the 3 generic PROs at 1 time point during their rehabilitation: the mDPA-Total, mDPA-physical summary component (mDPA-PSC), mDPA-mental summary component (mDPA-MSC), the PROMIS-PF, and SF-12 mental component summary (SF-MCS) and physical component summary (SF-PCS). Separate Spearman rank (r) correlations were performed to assess the strength of the relationship among PRO instruments. The floor and ceiling effects were also examined. Results A strong relationship was present between the SF-12 PCS and the mDPA-Total (r = −0.65), the mDPA-PSC (r = −0.64), and the PROMIS-PF (r = 0.65). Significant moderate relationships were identified between the mDPA-MSC and the SF-12 PCS (r = −0.43) and MCS (r = −0.53). Weak relationships were noted between the mDPA-Total and SF-12 MCS (r = −0.21) and the SF-12 MCS and mDPA-PSC (r = −0.10) and PROMIS-PF (r = 0.20). Conclusions The PROMIS-PF and mDPA had good convergent and divergent validity. Clinicians treating physically active patients should consider these instruments for use in clinical practice. Future researchers should examine additional psychometric properties of these instruments in physically active patients.

show abstract

Previous Knee Injury and Health-Related Quality of Life in Collegiate Athletes

Cited by 34 publications

References 36 publications

Prevalence of knee injuries among male college students in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Prevalence of knee injuries among male college students in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Disablement Model and Health-Related Quality of Life Classification for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments

The Relationship Among 3 Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Patients With Lower Extremity Health Conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About