2018
DOI: 10.21276/ijcmr.2018.5.8.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Previous LSCS: NO more Contraindication for non Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy

Abstract: Introduction: Hysterectomy is the most common operation performed in Gynecology department worldwide. It is performed by different route and for different indications. NDVH has many advantages over other routes. But presence of previous lower segment cesarean section scar makes the Gynecologists hesitant to choose NDVH as route of operation. Present study aimed to study difficulty encountered and ease to overcome these difficulties while performing NDVH in previous LSCS scarred cases. Material and methods:This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation is however different from what obtains in other centres [13,[24][25][26][27] where nondecent vaginal hysterectomies are a common and preferred procedure. An indication for hysterectomy in the absence of contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy is enough reason to perform hysterectomy through the vaginal route even with a bulky uterus [26][27][28] The presence of a previous caesarean section scar is no longer viewed as a contraindication to nondescent vaginal hysterectomy and is practiced in some centres [29] The practice of non descent vaginal hysterectomy has been found to be safe, associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer complications and morbidity and its thus a cost effective method of hysterectomy in women with large uteri requiring hysterectomy for benign conditions [26] . In conclusion, this study has shown that the indication for vaginal hysterectomy is limited in view of the numerous advantages it offers over abdominal hysterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is however different from what obtains in other centres [13,[24][25][26][27] where nondecent vaginal hysterectomies are a common and preferred procedure. An indication for hysterectomy in the absence of contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy is enough reason to perform hysterectomy through the vaginal route even with a bulky uterus [26][27][28] The presence of a previous caesarean section scar is no longer viewed as a contraindication to nondescent vaginal hysterectomy and is practiced in some centres [29] The practice of non descent vaginal hysterectomy has been found to be safe, associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer complications and morbidity and its thus a cost effective method of hysterectomy in women with large uteri requiring hysterectomy for benign conditions [26] . In conclusion, this study has shown that the indication for vaginal hysterectomy is limited in view of the numerous advantages it offers over abdominal hysterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%