2013
DOI: 10.1644/12-mamm-a-217.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey availability and foraging activity of grassland bats in relation to urbanization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fuscus activity in areas with a higher degree of urbanization [22, 30, 91, 92, 105], lower levels of insect abundance [11, 22] and higher levels of pollution [116]. It is possible that the extremely high level of urbanization and low insect levels in the core city area restrict these bats to the suburban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fuscus activity in areas with a higher degree of urbanization [22, 30, 91, 92, 105], lower levels of insect abundance [11, 22] and higher levels of pollution [116]. It is possible that the extremely high level of urbanization and low insect levels in the core city area restrict these bats to the suburban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are novel ecosystems in several ways: they are saturated with light, so patterns of nocturnal biodiversity are likely to be significantly disrupted [7, 8]; the food supply is quite different from natural areas, with an abundance of resources even in winter for granivores or other generalist animals [9, 10] but a reduced supply of invertebrates for insectivores [1113]; an abundance of potential roosts [14, 15]; a harsh matrix between foraging areas [16, 17]; and increased warmth in all seasons [18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid in manual validation, we compiled a reference library of echolocation calls from hand‐released bats captured in mist nets and around known roost locations in south Florida (Braun de Torrez et al , ). We further examined all files identified as Florida bonneted bats to classify those containing feeding buzzes, reflective of foraging activity (Fenton , Coleman and Barclay ). Feeding buzzes are characterized by increasing call repetition rates culminating in a rapid burst of calls as the bat attacks its prey (Griffin et al , Kalko ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified all files that contained ≥ 2 bat calls from Florida bonneted bats and used the number of such files per night as an index of bat activity (Britzke et al 1999;Tibbels and Kurta 2003;Davidai et al 2015). We further examined all files identified as Florida bonneted bats to classify those containing feeding buzzes, as a measure of foraging activity (Fenton 1970;Coleman and Barclay 2013). To reduce subjectivity, two researchers independently confirmed all manually validated files (program settings and call identification protocol; Additional file 1).…”
Section: Acoustic Surveys and Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%