2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey state alters trait‐mediated indirect interactions in rocky tide pools

Abstract: Summary1. Several studies on trait-mediated indirect interactions (TMIIs) have shown that predators can initiate trophic cascades by altering prey behaviour. Although it is well recognized that individual prey state alters antipredator and foraging behaviour, few studies explore whether this state-dependent prey behaviour can alter the strength of the ensuing tritrophic cascade. Here, we link state-dependent individual behaviour to community processes by experimentally testing whether hunger level and body siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not directly tested in this experiment, OA-induced attenuation of antipredator responses by snails could potentially lead them to forage under a greater range of conditions (e.g. even in the presence of sea stars), thereby shifting the consumer pressure of black turban snails on their algal food [24]. In particular, if snails increased their grazing rates but did not experience an accompanying elevation in mortality from sea stars, then algal densities might decline; on the other hand, if impaired flight responses incurred greater mortality of snails, then the net result for algae could be positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not directly tested in this experiment, OA-induced attenuation of antipredator responses by snails could potentially lead them to forage under a greater range of conditions (e.g. even in the presence of sea stars), thereby shifting the consumer pressure of black turban snails on their algal food [24]. In particular, if snails increased their grazing rates but did not experience an accompanying elevation in mortality from sea stars, then algal densities might decline; on the other hand, if impaired flight responses incurred greater mortality of snails, then the net result for algae could be positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in snail behaviour also have the potential to influence densities of algal species consumed by Tegula, both because such changes could influence snail foraging activities, and because altered flight responses could increase mortality of snails and thus how many might graze on algae (i.e. behavioural shifts could modify indirect effects of Pisaster on basal taxa through either 'non-consumptive' or 'consumptive' pathways [23,24]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, investigators have begun focusing on the context-dependency of TMII and factors altering its strength, such as environmental variation, features of informational cues, timing of measurements and individual variation in the traits of mediating species (Luttbeg et al 2003, Luttbeg & Trussell 2013, Matassa & Trussell 2014, Weissburg et al 2014, Gravem & Morgan 2016. For example, the transmission of predator cues to prey is strongly influenced by the environment, and air and water flow are particularly important for chemosensory cues (Smee et al 2010, Weissburg et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mounting evidence that these statedependent decisions by prey can alter the strength of TMII (Sih 1992, Freeman 2006. For example, hungry prey individuals are often less responsive to predators, and therefore mediate weaker TMIIs (Heithaus et al 2007, Matassa & Trussell 2014, Gravem & Morgan 2016. Large individuals also might have different antipredator behaviors, vulnerabilities, energetic demands and feeding rates than smaller prey individuals, which might subsequently affect the strength of TMII (Luttbeg et al 2003, Persson & De Roos 2003, Freeman 2006, Gravem & Morgan 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation