2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price and transaction volume in the Dutch housing market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kerste et al . () and De Wit, Englund and Francke () report percentages of 75% in 2010 and 55–60% in 2007, respectively.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kerste et al . () and De Wit, Englund and Francke () report percentages of 75% in 2010 and 55–60% in 2007, respectively.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…De Wit, Englund and Francke () identify three groups of theories in the literature that link prices and liquidity: (i) search and matching models, (ii) the interaction between downpayment constraints, mobility and house prices and (iii) behavioral explanations. The authors stress, however, that the three approaches are not mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most previous literature on this topic has focused on the US (see Clayton et al 2010). Although there have been several European-based studies on price-turnover dynamics, such as for Sweden (Hort 2000), the UK (Andrew and Meen 2003), and the Netherlands (De Wit et al 2013), there has not yet been a cross-country European study on this topic. This paper aims to fill this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Wit et al (2013), for example, find that especially the mortgage rate explains the price-turnover relationship in the Netherlands. Clayton et al (2010) argue that also labor market conditions and stock markets are important determinants in the US and that their impact depends on the supply elasticity of housing markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%