2010
DOI: 10.1080/00036840902881843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price clustering of IPOs in the secondary market

Abstract: This article studies the integer price clustering of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in the secondary market trading during the first 240 trading days after their IPO dates. The results indicate the huge difference between the integer price frequency of IPOs in the primary market and that of matched stocks in the secondary market almost disappears on the first trading day after IPO. The integer price frequency of IPOs is still significantly higher than that of matched stocks during the first 240 trading days. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…challenge confronting developing Asia during (Jongwanich & Park, 2009, leading results to interpretation problems in using returns denominated in the local currency. In Panel C of Table 2, we control trading activity by including trading activity as an independent variable into the empirical model to evaluate its impact on industry-market returns, which is a manner commonly adopted in previous studies (i.e., Chen, Martin, & Wang, 2012;Wang, 2010). The results in Panel C shows still hold in eight out of eleven industry-leading industries in controlling for trading activity, suggesting that trading activity does not substantially affect the industry leading relation here.…”
Section: Granger Causality Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…challenge confronting developing Asia during (Jongwanich & Park, 2009, leading results to interpretation problems in using returns denominated in the local currency. In Panel C of Table 2, we control trading activity by including trading activity as an independent variable into the empirical model to evaluate its impact on industry-market returns, which is a manner commonly adopted in previous studies (i.e., Chen, Martin, & Wang, 2012;Wang, 2010). The results in Panel C shows still hold in eight out of eleven industry-leading industries in controlling for trading activity, suggesting that trading activity does not substantially affect the industry leading relation here.…”
Section: Granger Causality Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%