1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(86)90117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price competition in a capacity-constrained duopoly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
156
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
156
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 As noted by Cripps and Ireland (1988), the homogeneous nature of the market means that if buyers are rationed at a firm, the sets of successful and unsuccessful buyers are identical. Hence, our results are valid regardless of the rationing rule, including those investigated by Davidson and Deneckere (1986), Osborne and Pitchik (1986) or Lepore (2008), among others. Our results are also independent of the tiebreaking rule.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 As noted by Cripps and Ireland (1988), the homogeneous nature of the market means that if buyers are rationed at a firm, the sets of successful and unsuccessful buyers are identical. Hence, our results are valid regardless of the rationing rule, including those investigated by Davidson and Deneckere (1986), Osborne and Pitchik (1986) or Lepore (2008), among others. Our results are also independent of the tiebreaking rule.…”
Section: The Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Equilibrium pricing in this case was first analyzed by Cripps and Ireland (1988), 7 whose results we report next (see also Osborne and Pitchik, 1986): Proposition 1. (Cripps and Ireland (1988)) In the pricing stage, for given θ and k − ≤ k + , there is a unique equilibrium which satisfies the following:…”
Section: Pricing Stagementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Several variants of the Bertrand game have also been studied, e.g., [6], [7], [8], [18]. Chawla et al [18] consider price competition in networks where each seller owns a capacityconstrained link, and decides the price for using it; the consumers choose paths they would use in the networks based on the prices declared and pay the sellers accordingly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the link capacities are deterministic in [18], whereas the availability of bandwidth is random in our model. However, none of the above papers [6], [7], [8], [18] consider the spectrum-specific issue of spatial reuse, which introduces a new dimension, that each player not only needs to determine the price of the commodity it owns (as in [6], [7], [8], [18]), but also select an independent set to compete in. The joint decision problem significantly complicates the analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation