Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications &Amp; Services 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1806338.1806382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price definition in the establishment of electronic contracts for web services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth highlighting the importance of semantics of clauses and validation of the e-contract template. Web services are a major tool to manage the e-contract terms in organizational business systems (Marchione et al, 2009) (Chiu et al, 2003). Regarding the use of contracts in composition of Web Services, a notable work is that one of Milanovic (Milanovic, 2005).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting the importance of semantics of clauses and validation of the e-contract template. Web services are a major tool to manage the e-contract terms in organizational business systems (Marchione et al, 2009) (Chiu et al, 2003). Regarding the use of contracts in composition of Web Services, a notable work is that one of Milanovic (Milanovic, 2005).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an item of evaluation that supports the negotiator. Price is an usual example of negotiation variable [25]. PL4BPM considers two main types of negotiation variables: e-services properties and QoS attributes.…”
Section: Activities Of the Planning And Negotiation Agenda Settings Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an item of evaluation that supports the negotiator. An usual example of negotiation variable is price [Marchione et al 2010]. PL4BPM considers two main types of negotiation variables: e-services properties and QoS attributes.…”
Section: Figure 2 the Conceptual Model Of Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%