2012
DOI: 10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price Discovery in Indian Agricultural Commodity Markets

Abstract: In this paper, the price discovery relationship for ten agricultural commodities has been examined. Price discovery is confirmed for all commodities except Turmeric. Price discovery results are encouraging given the nascent character of commodity market in India. However the market does not seem to be competitive. The findings have implications for policy makers, hedgers and investors and will help in deeply understanding the role of futures market in information dissemination. The commodity exchanges must str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the cointegration tests state that both markets are cointegrated for three commodities, suggesting that there is a long term relationship exists between spot and futures markets. Sanjay, Namita and Rajeev [15] examine the short run lead-lag relationship between futures and spot prices. The results of Granger causality test show that there is a bi-directional Granger lead relationships between spot and futures in all agricultural commodities except turmeric in which there is no causality exists.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the cointegration tests state that both markets are cointegrated for three commodities, suggesting that there is a long term relationship exists between spot and futures markets. Sanjay, Namita and Rajeev [15] examine the short run lead-lag relationship between futures and spot prices. The results of Granger causality test show that there is a bi-directional Granger lead relationships between spot and futures in all agricultural commodities except turmeric in which there is no causality exists.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the results of research conducted on efficiency of different markets suggest conflicting findings. We find evidence of efficiency in works of A. Singh and N. P. Singh (2015), Gupta and Ravi (2013), Sehgal, Rajput, and Dua (2012), Ali and Gupta (2011), Chakrabarty and Sarkar (2010), Singh (2010), Lokare (2007), Bose (2009), Gulen (1998), etc. However, inefficiency evidence has been found in works of Inoue and Hamori (2014), Soni and Singla (2012), Easwaran and Ramasundaram (2008), Wang and Ke (2005), Mckenzie and Holt (2002), and many others, while mixed results have been found in the studies of Aulton, Ennew, and Rayner (1997), MacDonald and Taylor (1988), Wang and Ke (2005), Singh (2004), etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This test will evaluate whether the test found is that there is an unidirectional relationship between futures and spot market which indicates the flow of information between the two markets. Analysis will use the following models as also used by Bose (2007), Sahoo and Kumar (2009), Ali and Gupta (2011) and Sehgal et al (2012). P (j)t represents spot price of coffee type j in certain period of time of t, F d(j)t represent futures price coffee type j in certain period of time of t until k and d represent delivery of coffee referring to the delivery month of contract of both Arabica and Robusta, while ε 1t , ε 2t , ε 3t dan ε 4t are mutually uncorrelated error term.…”
Section: Augmented Dickey Fuller Test (Unit Root Testing)mentioning
confidence: 99%