1998
DOI: 10.1080/09538259800000060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prices and Distribution in a Sraffian Credit Economy

Abstract: Sraffa's suggestion regarding the monetary determination of the rate of profits raises two fundamental questions addressed by this paper: (i) can the money rates of interest be envisaged as variables set by the financial system independently of the real sector of the economy? (ii) How can they determine the general rate of profits and so allow for the determination of natural prices and income distribution? To elaborate on the intuition that the competitive process must link the rate of profits earned in the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to do this we will base our analysis on the model briefly outlined by Lavoie (1993) and further 5 Lavoie (1995) shows that this result is not only true for the Kaldor/Robinson variant of the post-Keynesian distribution and growth model based on flexible prices with respect to demand but also for Eichner's model based on mark-up pricing in an oligopolistic goods market in which the mark-up is determined by the required internal means of finance for planned investment. 6 See Panico (1985), Pivetti (1985Pivetti ( , 1987Pivetti ( , 1991Pivetti ( , 2001 and Ciccarone (1998), among others. elaborated in Hein (1999), and we will explicitly consider the effects of debt and interest payments in this model, in the short as well as in the long run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to do this we will base our analysis on the model briefly outlined by Lavoie (1993) and further 5 Lavoie (1995) shows that this result is not only true for the Kaldor/Robinson variant of the post-Keynesian distribution and growth model based on flexible prices with respect to demand but also for Eichner's model based on mark-up pricing in an oligopolistic goods market in which the mark-up is determined by the required internal means of finance for planned investment. 6 See Panico (1985), Pivetti (1985Pivetti ( , 1987Pivetti ( , 1991Pivetti ( , 2001 and Ciccarone (1998), among others. elaborated in Hein (1999), and we will explicitly consider the effects of debt and interest payments in this model, in the short as well as in the long run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If changes in the interest rate are lasting, however, mark-up and profit share will have to change in the same direction, because in the long run firms can only sustain those production processes which yield the minimum rate of profit determined by the interest rate. This position that considers interest to be a part of firms' long-run costs of production can, in particular, be found in neo-Ricardian work (Ciccarone 1998;Panico 1985;Pivetti 1985Pivetti , 1988Pivetti , 1991. There it is argued that the exogenously given monetary interest rate determines the rate of profit and closes the degree of freedom of the production price model by Sraffa (1960).…”
Section: The Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The types of loans considered in the Sraffian models proposed by Dvoskin and Feldman (2021), Panico et al. (2012), and Ciccarone (1998) do not coincide. Dvoskin and Feldman (2021) and Ciccarone (1998) consider loans that are known in creditor terminology as “asset‐based loans”, Panico et al.…”
Section: A Linear Model Of Joint Production With Corporate Firms and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of loans considered in the Sraffian models proposed by Dvoskin and Feldman ( 2021 ), Panico et al ( 2012 ), and Ciccarone ( 1998 ) do not coincide. Dvoskin and Feldman ( 2021 ) and Ciccarone ( 1998 ) consider loans that are known in creditor terminology as "asset-based loans", Panico et al ( 2012 ) assume loans called "cash-flow loans". 7 The main difference between "asset-based loans" and "cash-flow loans" is that while "cash-flow loans" finance working capital and allow firms to buy and sell intermediate inputs and products to continue operating, "asset-based loans" finance investment in fixed capital and allow firms to expand.…”
Section: The Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation