2014 IEEE 33rd International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pccc.2014.7017112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing and revenue sharing mechanism for secondary redistribution of data service for mobile devices

Abstract: Cellular Network Providers (CNP) provide users with wireless data access to meet the growing ubiquitous demand for the Internet. As users subscribe to a fixed data plan for a monthly flat fee, some users may exhaust their data allowance before the end of the billing cycle, while others underutilize their monthly quota. To take advantage of such underutilization, Khausik et. al. propose a mechanism for ad hoc bandwidth redistribution that allows subscribers to sell their unused bandwidth to users needing Intern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which also implies that ({ }) decreases when → ( ) . Thus, in (14) decreases as → ( ) , which also satisfies property 1. That is, if ({ }) decreases, then, also decreases.…”
Section: Theorem 2: I-wfpmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, which also implies that ({ }) decreases when → ( ) . Thus, in (14) decreases as → ( ) , which also satisfies property 1. That is, if ({ }) decreases, then, also decreases.…”
Section: Theorem 2: I-wfpmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…where is the transmission power of user mobile device, is the channel gained from WFP to user , and 2 is the Gaussian noise variance for the channel between and [14]. In other words, ( ) is influenced by the channel quality and the amount of bandwidth.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) This revenue distribution mechanism satisfies the following desired property [8], [15], [20], [21]: fairness or balanced contribution, which says that for any pair of servers i, j ∈ N S , j's contribution to i equals i's contribution to j, i.e.,…”
Section: A Shapley-value Revenue Sharing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ( ) and ( , ) denote user utility with bandwidth consumption and service cost, respectively. Considering the WFP is operating at frequency band , the utility function of bandwidth usage is defined as follows where is the transmission power of user mobile device, is the channel gained from WFP to user , and 2 is the Gaussian noise variance for the channel between and [14]. In other words, ( ) is influenced by the channel quality and the amount of bandwidth.…”
Section: A User Utility Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation setup includes an WFP providing 1000MB/sec to users with initial minimum price charged by an ISP of 10 units currency, minimum profit desired by the WFP is 5 units currency, users maximum willingness to pay is 100 units currency, and user utility and price are measured and determined using eq. (9) and (14) respectively. In this scenario, we consider two case studies: ( ) When the WFP experiences lower and ( ) higher demand for bandwidth.…”
Section: A Revenue Sharing Between Isp and E-wfpmentioning
confidence: 99%