Pricing Equity Index Annuities with Surrender Options in Four Models

Kélani, Abdou; Quittard-Pinon, François

doi:10.2139/ssrn.1994349

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…contracts using a variety of techniques without considering income and wealth tax. Bauer et al (2008); Bacinello et al (2011) and Kélani and Quittard-Pinon (2013) provide universal pricing frameworks for various riders embedded in VA contracts when the underlying fund dynamics evolve under the influence of geometric brownian motion (GBM) and Lévy markets, respectively. Incorporating a surrender option is a recent development that addresses the underpricing of lapse risk 5 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Taxation and Policyholder Behavior: The Case of Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefits

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers variable annuity contracts embedded with guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) riders when policyholder's proceeds are taxed. These contracts promise the return of the premium paid by the policyholder, or a higher stepped up value, at the end of the investment period. A partial differential valuation framework, which exploits the numerical method of lines, is used to determine fair fees that render the policyholder and insurer profits neutral. Two taxation regimes are considered; one where capital gains are allowed to offset losses and a second where gains do not offset losses, reflecting stylized institutional arrangements in Australia and the US respectively. Most insurance providers highlight the tax-deferred feature of a variable annuity. We show that the regime under which the insurance provider is taxed significantly impacts supply and demand prices. If losses are allowed to offset gains then this enhances the market, narrowing the gap between fees, and even producing higher demand than supply fees. On the other hand, when losses are not allowed to offset gains, then the demand-supply gap increases. When charging the demand price, we show that insurance companies would be profitable on average. Low (high) Sharpe ratios are not as profitable as policyholders are more likely to stay long (surrender).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%