2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-011-0660-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing rules and Arrow–Debreu ambiguous valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economies with incomplete financial markets are also closely related because the so‐called super‐replication functional is also a Knightian expectation. Araujo, Chateauneuf, and Faro () discussed sublinear functionals that satisfy similar axioms as our Knightian expectation. They showed that the sublinear price functional is equal to the superhedging price of an exogenous incomplete and arbitrage‐free financial market if and only if the subspace of claims whose expectation does not depend on a specific prior Pnormalℙ coincides with the subspace of undominated claims under normal𝔼.…”
Section: Knight–walras Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economies with incomplete financial markets are also closely related because the so‐called super‐replication functional is also a Knightian expectation. Araujo, Chateauneuf, and Faro () discussed sublinear functionals that satisfy similar axioms as our Knightian expectation. They showed that the sublinear price functional is equal to the superhedging price of an exogenous incomplete and arbitrage‐free financial market if and only if the subspace of claims whose expectation does not depend on a specific prior Pnormalℙ coincides with the subspace of undominated claims under normal𝔼.…”
Section: Knight–walras Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, m > 0 (m < 0) signifies investor optimism (pessimism) and s = 1 means volatility is measured subjectively, generally underestimated, because of behavioral factor s. Since m and s are both determined by the capacity variable c, the latter is usually viewed as a composite indicator of investor ambiguity and uncertainty attitudes. Comparable to k-ignorance, c has been used as a measure of uncertainty attitude or degree of confidence about probabilistic judgment in decision-making and behavioral economics (Eichberger and Kelsey 1999;Wakker 2001;Araujo et al 2012). Acting as a conditional capacity in the Choquet integral, c summarizes decision-makers' ambiguity perceptions about index prices, with 0 < c < 0.5 representing degrees of ambiguity aversion, while 0.5 < c < 1 implying ambiguity-seeking behavior.…”
Section: Background and Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend the Black-Scholes (BS) (1973) setting by incorporating ambiguity through Choquet Brownian motions, multiple-priors and the notion of c-ignorance (see e.g., Chateauneuf et al 1996;Agliardi and Sereno 2011;Araujo et al 2012) to the option pricing apparatus. We then use our extended model to empirically assess the informational efficiency of option implied volatility and ambiguity as predictors of stock index realized volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature that applies the super-hedging approach to asset pricing with model uncertainty, for example, Epstein and Ji (2013), Mykland (2000) and Vorbrink (2014). Araujo et al (2002) show that the super-hedging pricing approach is natural to study the Arrow-Debreu valuation problem with ambiguity. In this section, we propose a general concept of true asset price under model uncertainty.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%