2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing the quality of differentiated services for media-oriented real-time applications: A multi-attribute negotiation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, they concede slower when resources such as the bandwidth are scarce. Comuzzi et al [22] proposed a resource dependent negotiation strategy for pricing of network services. Similar to our approach, the negotiation strategy is time dependent, bilateral, and considers multiple criteria.…”
Section: Cloud and Grid Computing Sla Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they concede slower when resources such as the bandwidth are scarce. Comuzzi et al [22] proposed a resource dependent negotiation strategy for pricing of network services. Similar to our approach, the negotiation strategy is time dependent, bilateral, and considers multiple criteria.…”
Section: Cloud and Grid Computing Sla Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As any user arrival or departure from the network requires a reallocation of resource/services (and, consequently, triggers a new auction), the auction-theoretic approach is suitable to applications with elastic QoS requirements. On this line, bilateral negotiation protocols [7], [8], [9] have been adopted to tackle the congestion problem [10], with the service provider negotiating (and possibly agreeing upon) the communication parameters with a customer only once, upon the latter arrival. As observed in [10], the underlying negotiation-theoretic assumption that the supplier and the customer utilities are linear in negotiation parameters [7] hampers the straightforward application of negotiation algorithms to a networking setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this line, bilateral negotiation protocols [7], [8], [9] have been adopted to tackle the congestion problem [10], with the service provider negotiating (and possibly agreeing upon) the communication parameters with a customer only once, upon the latter arrival. As observed in [10], the underlying negotiation-theoretic assumption that the supplier and the customer utilities are linear in negotiation parameters [7] hampers the straightforward application of negotiation algorithms to a networking setting. In this light, we propose a negotiation algorithm, based on [7], that can accommodate the nonlinear utilities of end-users and providers, for any number of negotiated attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%