2016
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2016.1255348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing via recursive quantization in stochastic volatility models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results improve the option pricing performance in Ackerer et al (2018). Notable progress has recently been made on the pricing of early-exercise and path-dependent options with stochastic volatility using recursive marginal quantization as studied in Pagès and Sagna (2015); McWalter et al (2017); Callegaro et al (2017a). In the context of affine and polynomial models, this approach has been shown to perform well when combined with Fourier transform techniques as in Callegaro et al (2017b), or polynomial expansion techniques as in Callegaro et al (2017), whose results could be further improved with the new expansions presented in our paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Our results improve the option pricing performance in Ackerer et al (2018). Notable progress has recently been made on the pricing of early-exercise and path-dependent options with stochastic volatility using recursive marginal quantization as studied in Pagès and Sagna (2015); McWalter et al (2017); Callegaro et al (2017a). In the context of affine and polynomial models, this approach has been shown to perform well when combined with Fourier transform techniques as in Callegaro et al (2017b), or polynomial expansion techniques as in Callegaro et al (2017), whose results could be further improved with the new expansions presented in our paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The pricing of European options under local and stochastic volatility models using recursive quantization techniques has already been studied, see e.g. [19] and [4] for the local volatility case, and [5] for the stochastic volatility case. However, the method we present here is more general and is model free compared to [5] where the method depends on the structure of the model.…”
Section: Pricing Of a European Option In The Heston Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formulas (14)- (15) are useful when, for example, we deal with the approximation of the solution of BSDEs or when we deal with the pricing of a Basket call like Equation (5). In this last situation, given a time discretization mesh t 0 = 0, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, x j d d,k . Having computed all these elements, it is possible to compute the (approximate) distortion function (33), its gradient and its Hessian function and to implement the Newton-Raphson algorithm as in Callegaro et al (2015) and Callegaro et al (2016).…”
Section: Mathematical Foundation Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recursive marginal quantization, or fast quantization, introduced in Pagès and Sagna (2015) represents a new promising research field. Sub-optimal (stationary) quantizers of the stochastic process at fixed dates are obtained in a very fast recursive way, to the point that recursive marginal quantization has been successfully applied to many models, including local volatility models as in Callegaro et al (2015), Bormetti et al (2017), McWalter et al (2017) and stochastic volatility models as in Callegaro et al (2016), Fiorin et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%