Pride and Prejudice: West Indian Men in Mid-Twentieth-Century Britain

Abstract

Of all the immigrants arriving in Britain in the middle of the twentieth century, none attracted as much attention from whites as West Indian men. This was initially explicable by their being the first nonwhites to settle in large numbers. Around ten thousand arrived during the Second World War (more than Britain's entire prewar black population) and, although some two-thirds of them were hurriedly repatriated after 1945, returning ex-servicemen formed the majority of passengers disembarking from the Empire Windrush on 21 June 1948: year zero for mass black immigration. For the following decade, most of the Commonwealth immigrants coming to Britain each year were West Indian, and, of these, men outnumbered women by a ratio of roughly two to one.'In the late 1950s and 1960s, as their womenfolk joined them and as South Asians formed an ever-increasing proportion of new arrivals, it became clear that the prominence of West Indian men was more than merely numerical. It was cultural, stemming from the fascination-cumrevulsion of whites who customarily regarded them as vicious, indolent, violent, licentious, and antifamilial. These qualities were thought to differentiate them from their South Asian counterparts, who overcame an unsavory reputation acquired in the fifties to be viewed as the new Jews, placid and hard-working family men whose strict endogamy nullified MARCUS COLLINS is Sir James Knott Fellow in History at the University of Newcastle. He wishes to thank

The significance of faith for Black men's educational aspirations

“…The UK also required certification of skills. Many Caribbeans who possessed technical and professional skills such as engineering found that their expertise was not deemed as a credible or recognised qualification in the UK, which relegated most of these new emigrants to low-skilled menial jobs (see Ramdin, 1987;Cross & Johnson, 1988;Collins, 2001). 6 Prior to the 1950s, Black Africans numbered less than 10,000 in the UK (Banton, 1955).…”

Must Love Kill the Family Firm? Some Exploratory Evidence

“…In such cultures, girls might thus accept their parents' choice of a partner, while men might marry for "romantic" love (Dion & Dion, 1983). Indeed, the macho ideals of Latin American culture have been linked to romantic notions of chivalry (Collins, 2001). Overall, however, greater gender differentiation portends a more conservative culture and would seem to lean toward a higher incidence of arranged marriage.…”

Sometimes antagonistic, sometimes ardently sympathetic: Contradictory responses to migrants in postwar Britain

“…The quote is specifically cited by Wendy Webster (2001Webster ( , 2007 and Frank Mort (2010). It appears also to have had an impact on the arguments of Chris Waters (1997) and Marcus Collins (2001), as I will go on to show. 6 Yet Schwarz, in the two pages in the essay which he devotes to the evocative idea of bringing the ideas of the colonial frontier 'home', is more tentative than some of those who draw on his framework.…”

“…Marcus Collins (2001) is the most extreme in this respect. His 'Pride and prejudice: West Indian men in mid-twentieth century Britain', which, like Waters' article, was also published in the Journal of British Studies, starts out by saying in an astonishingly cavalier fashion, without supporting evidence or qualification, that: 'In the late 1950s and 1960s … whites customarily regarded [West Indian men] as vicious, indolent, violent, licentious and antifamilial.'…”