2014 Power Systems Computation Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pscc.2014.7038446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primal and dual bounds for Optimal Transmission Switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of iterations of the cutting-plane algorithm on F soc and F dc is also consistent with this hypothesis. This type of behavior was also observed in the literature on similar problems such as Optimal Transmission Switching [23,13]. However, it is uncommon.…”
Section: Performance Of the Cutting-plane Algorithm On Categories (C2supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of iterations of the cutting-plane algorithm on F soc and F dc is also consistent with this hypothesis. This type of behavior was also observed in the literature on similar problems such as Optimal Transmission Switching [23,13]. However, it is uncommon.…”
Section: Performance Of the Cutting-plane Algorithm On Categories (C2supporting
confidence: 74%
“…There are outliers to the fact that the cutting‐plane algorithm on scriptF dc and scriptF soc results in the same choice of interdiction plans; for instance consider the instance IEEE three‐area RTS96 with 73 buses: when k = 3 , the Hamming distance between the interdiction plans obtained from the two formulations is 2 and the difference between the objective values obtained using the primal recovery procedure is 15%. In fact, there are many other problems in power systems where the SOC relaxation and the DC approximation of the power flow constraints produce contrasting results. We delegate to future work the need for further study to determine if the sameness of the solutions between the two formulations holds more generally for the PNK.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristic algorithms are also used in solving the ACOTS problems [19,20]. In [19], the accuracies of ACOTS and DC optimal TS (DCOTS) are compared using heuristic algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that DCOTS model may be inaccurate and performs poorly in several cases. In [20], the DCOTS approximation model, the SDP and SOCP relaxation methods, and the original AC model solved by heuristic algorithms are compared. The results demonstrate that the DC power flow model is not reliable for obtaining optimal line switching results, while the heuristic algorithms can be valuable for finding AC feasible solutions, and the relaxation method is instrumental in guaranteeing the optimization objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of the DC power flow is a topic of much discussion: Some papers take an favorable outlook, (e.g., [2,7]), while others (e.g., [8][9][10][11]) are more cautious. The accuracy of the DC power flow is particularly important in power restoration as a feasible AC base-point solution is often not available and it is preferable to operate the network near its design limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%