Primary and Secondary Effects of Social Origins on Educational Attainment: New Findings for England

Abstract

We aim to bring together two strands of existing research into inequalities in individuals’ educational attainment associated with their social origins: that into the relative importance of the primary and secondary effects of social origins; and that into the relative importance of different components of social origins, indicative of different kinds of parental resources. Our main findings are the following. The secondary effects of social origins – their effects via the educational choices that young people make given their prior academic performance – are clearly operative across five key educational transitions within the English educational system. More specifically, we estimate that 35% of the total effect of social origins is secondary in the earliest transition we consider, and from 15-20% in the subsequent four. Further, mediation analyses reveal that secondary effects are most strongly associated with parental education and then to a lesser degree with parental status, while little association exists with parental class and none at all with parental income. Primary effects are also at all transitions most strongly associated with parental education and status but in this case both parental class and parental income do retain some importance. Finally, secondary effects on educational transitions appear to be top-driven. There is a clear tendency for their importance to be greater in the case of young people with highly educated, professional parents as compared with those of all other social backgrounds. We suggest an explanation for our empirical findings as resulting largely from the concern of such parents and their children to avoid the occurrence of downward intergenerational mobility, especially in terms of education and status.

Social Inequality in Educational Attainment in China

“…In their analysis of the educational attainment of the three cohorts in Britain (1946,1958,1970), they find the origin-education association weakening when education is measured on an absolute scale but showing a trendless fluctuation if one takes a relative measure. It is this shift from absolute to relative perspective that makes the positions between Breen et al and Bukodi and Goldthorpe complementing rather than necessarily contradicting each other (see also Blanden et al, 2005;Bukodi et al, 2021;Li, 2021, and note 1 for additional evidence).…”

Life-Cycle Economic Returns to Educational Mobility in Denmark

“…The consensus in this literature is that education plays a major role in facilitating social mobility and is often referred to as the ‘great equalizer’ in society (Bernardi and Ballarino, 2016). The centrality of parental education in the education attainment process (see particularly Bukodi et al, 2021) suggests that intergenerational educational mobility is a major force shaping overall equality of opportunity in society, as ‘education is the main vehicle of social reproduction’ (Ganzeboom et al, 1991: 284). Indeed, educational stratification researchers have long been occupied with studying intergenerational educational mobility (e.g.…”