1966
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470140041006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary and Secondary Spike Foci Following Depth Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we did find that spontaneous seizures showed a propagation to the homologous regions of the opposite hemisphere and most frequently to the rhinencephalon in 45%. This seems to be in accordance with the experimental findings in animals (Guerrero-Figueroa et al, 1964; Proctor et al, 1966) that mirror foci are not limited to the cortex but have been established in limbic and other structures synaptically related to a primary subcortical focus. We know also that the commissural connections of the two cerebral hemispheres are extensive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, we did find that spontaneous seizures showed a propagation to the homologous regions of the opposite hemisphere and most frequently to the rhinencephalon in 45%. This seems to be in accordance with the experimental findings in animals (Guerrero-Figueroa et al, 1964; Proctor et al, 1966) that mirror foci are not limited to the cortex but have been established in limbic and other structures synaptically related to a primary subcortical focus. We know also that the commissural connections of the two cerebral hemispheres are extensive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There is similar midline thalamic hypometabolism in the rat model used in this study (63). Proctor et al (65) demonstrated a well‐synchronized interaction of spike activity between the medial dorsal thalamus and the amygdala after focal application of penicillin to the amygdala, supporting the concept of a physiologic interaction of epileptiform activity between the limbic system and its thalamic contacts. One difference between the human and rat findings is the strongly lateralized abnormalities in the human, with more variable but bilateral involvement of changes in physiology and pathology in the rat models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%