2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-023-01576-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary and Secondary Variants of Callous–Unemotional Traits in Early and Middle Childhood: Distinction, Evaluation and Empathic Differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, our preliminary and initial findings suggest that anticipatory fear deficits may be a characteristic of the primary variant of CU but require replication on larger samples for further substantiation. This conclusion is broadly consistent with prior work that demonstrates distinct psychophysiological and behavioral characteristics between the primary and secondary variants in children with conduct problems [ 60 , 61 ]. Further delineation of the heterogeneity in children with high CU traits may help advance our understanding of the developmental pathways to childhood antisocial behavior and improve treatment of antisocial individuals, particularly those on the primary CU path.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In conclusion, our preliminary and initial findings suggest that anticipatory fear deficits may be a characteristic of the primary variant of CU but require replication on larger samples for further substantiation. This conclusion is broadly consistent with prior work that demonstrates distinct psychophysiological and behavioral characteristics between the primary and secondary variants in children with conduct problems [ 60 , 61 ]. Further delineation of the heterogeneity in children with high CU traits may help advance our understanding of the developmental pathways to childhood antisocial behavior and improve treatment of antisocial individuals, particularly those on the primary CU path.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%