2022
DOI: 10.1177/15910199221089446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary balloon angioplasty of venous Sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Abstract: Background Venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH). However, stenting carries risk of in-stent stenosis/thrombosis and cumulative bleeding risk from long-term dual antiplatelet (DAPT) use. Thus, we investigated the potential safety and efficacy of primary balloon angioplasty as an alternative to stenting in IIH. Methods A prospectively maintained single-center registry of IIH patients undergoing endovascular procedu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carter et al 106 described a 15-year-old who was treated with venoplasty alone, with the resolution of papilledema at discharge and a sustained resolution of symptoms of high ICP at 1 year. However, Martinez-Gutierrez et al 64 compared 53 stented patients with 9 who underwent only balloon angioplasty and found a lower rate of improvement in papilledema (44% vs 93%), headache (44% vs 92%), and visual disturbance (50% vs 92%) at 6 weeks in the angioplasty group. The mean change in OP was only 6 cm H 2 O (vs 13 in the stented group), and 44% ultimately required a VPS to control ICP (vs 2% in the stenting group).…”
Section: Venoplasty Without Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carter et al 106 described a 15-year-old who was treated with venoplasty alone, with the resolution of papilledema at discharge and a sustained resolution of symptoms of high ICP at 1 year. However, Martinez-Gutierrez et al 64 compared 53 stented patients with 9 who underwent only balloon angioplasty and found a lower rate of improvement in papilledema (44% vs 93%), headache (44% vs 92%), and visual disturbance (50% vs 92%) at 6 weeks in the angioplasty group. The mean change in OP was only 6 cm H 2 O (vs 13 in the stented group), and 44% ultimately required a VPS to control ICP (vs 2% in the stenting group).…”
Section: Venoplasty Without Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As such, venous sinus stenting has emerged as a promising treatment for IIH. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Owing to the low prevalence of IIH with concurrent VSS and the heterogeneity of the disease, conducting large-scale studies has proven challenging. An expanding literature of singlecenter or small multicenter experiences with VSS stenting has provided promising evidence of potential efficacy of this treatment but has also highlighted the immense diversity in patient selection criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%