2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/733/1/012054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary calibration of measurement microphones in the world: state of art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to determine the potential of the proposed method for dynamic pressure measurement. If successful, using this method, we could establish the traceability of BP devices through calibration according to acoustic standards such as the primary method for pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones by the reciprocity technique (IEC 61094-2:2009/AMD1:2022) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aimed to determine the potential of the proposed method for dynamic pressure measurement. If successful, using this method, we could establish the traceability of BP devices through calibration according to acoustic standards such as the primary method for pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones by the reciprocity technique (IEC 61094-2:2009/AMD1:2022) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods that can be used to calibrate acoustic transducers at infrasonic frequencies. [9][10][11][12] At present, the phase response of acoustic transducers are commonly calibrated using in-situ or calibrator methods to get their phase consistency, [13][14][15][16] while the primary calibration (mainly includes the reciprocity technique and pistonphone), [17][18][19] by which the acoustic transducer is calibrated with reference to non-acoustic standards and with the highest possible precision, is few studied. R. Jackett et al have determined the phase sensitivity uncertainty of microphone based on the reciprocity technique, and found that the low frequency uncertainty due to leakage in microphone cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%