2019
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary carcinosarcoma of the ureteropelvic junction associated with ureteral duplication

Abstract: Rationale: Primary carcinosarcoma of the upper urinary tract is rare. Ureteral duplication is one of the most common urinary tract malformations. Additionally, the association between ureteral duplication and malignancy is unknown. To the best of our knowledge, no cases of malignant tumors diagnosed as carcinosarcoma with ureteral duplication have been reported. We herein report the case of a patient with carcinosarcoma of the ureteropelvic junction associated with incomplete ureteral duplication.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duplication of bladder can arise completely or incompletely (Awashi et al 2015, Tsuji et al 2019, Kuliniec et al 2021. In incomplete duplication, both bladders are interconnected and drained by one urethra, while the complete duplication, the bladder are separated by a wall consisting of mucosa and muscles of varying sizes with two or only one urethra, so that total obstruction can occur on the side that does not have a urethral (Frimberger & Kropp 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplication of bladder can arise completely or incompletely (Awashi et al 2015, Tsuji et al 2019, Kuliniec et al 2021. In incomplete duplication, both bladders are interconnected and drained by one urethra, while the complete duplication, the bladder are separated by a wall consisting of mucosa and muscles of varying sizes with two or only one urethra, so that total obstruction can occur on the side that does not have a urethral (Frimberger & Kropp 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%