Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Wage Differences by Employment Setting

Li, Yin; Holmes, George M.; Fraher, Erin; Mark, Barbara A.; Jones, Cheryl B.

doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.06.009

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11 , 37 , 38 Specifically for NPs, previous work has documented high-level variation in earnings across employment settings, and specific differences for primary care NPs. 5 , 11 , 28 , 39 However, most existing findings do not specifically look at long-term-care NPs, and the National Academies report found much smaller differences when using the same data, 11 suggesting the importance of accounting for individual-level characteristics. Moreover, other studies have documented high turnover among long-term-care workers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Earnings, job satisfaction, and turnover of nurse practitioners across employment settings

Hnath,

Rambur,

Grabowski

2023

Health Affairs Scholar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nurse practitioners (NPs) are an important part of the health care workforce. However, little information is available on NP earnings, job satisfaction, or turnover. National survey data from 2018 offers a pre-COVID baseline for ongoing NP workforce monitoring. We found evidence that NPs earned roughly $92,500 annually, ranging from $82,800 in long-term care to $95,600 in hospital settings. Wages increased with tenure in the workforce and varied considerably by geography. Roughly one-in-five NPs switched jobs annually, with some net in-flow to ambulatory settings. Both NPs that left their position or considered leaving reported better pay and benefits, burnout, management role, stressful work environment, career advancement, and inadequate staffing as the primary explanations. These findings were augmented by analysis of 2012-2022 Bureau of Labor Statistics data that illustrated substantial growth in the NP workforce. Improving NP job satisfaction has the direct benefit of supporting a critical and growing segment of the health workforce; it has the additional benefit of reducing job turnover and the associated costs, potentially increasing earnings for NPs. Policies that improve working conditions for NPs in different employment settings will not just increase immediate job satisfaction but also ideally strengthen the longer-term labor market to improve patient outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Earnings, job satisfaction, and turnover of nurse practitioners across employment settings

Hnath,

Rambur,

Grabowski

2023

Health Affairs Scholar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Li et al performed a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration, and the 2012 National Survey of Nurse Practitioners. 22 They reported a clear difference between NPs working in primary care, with an average hourly wage of $43.70, and NPs in specialty care settings, with an hourly average of $47.20. While these authors did not specifically provide data for surgical settings, 70.1% of their sample reported having a specialty care place of employment.…”

Section: Compensation For Appsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current State of Advanced Practice Providers in Urological Practice

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:This document provides an update to the 2015 consensus statement with new content on inpatient utilization, procedural data, and compensation. The full document is available on the American Urological Association (AUA) website (https://www.auanet.org/ guidelines/guidelines/current-state-of-advanced-practice-providers-in-urologic-practice). This document was created by an ad-hoc group of urological providers formed by the AUA board of directors.Methods: A workforce shortage of 65,000 physicians is projected by the year 2025. In 2018, there were 3.89 urologists per capita, which is amongst the most severe specialty shortages. Urology has the second oldest surgical subspecialty workforce with an average age of 52.5 years. According to the 2018 census, 72.5% of urologists used an advanced practice provider (APP) in their practice, and APPs accounted for 41% of a medical doctor/doctor of osteopathy full-time equivalent. The AUA endorses the use of APPs in the care of patients through a formally defined, supervised role with a board certified urologist under the auspices of applicable state law. This physician-led, teambased approach provides the highest quality urological care.Results: Urologists work with APPs frequently, but many may not know the most efficient way to incorporate them into their practice. This document examines APP integration from a regulatory and practice management approach, as well as provides information on inpatient utilization, procedural data, and compensation.Conclusions: This document supports the AUA's policy statement that in a team-based approach with a board certified urologist in a supervisory role, APPs contribute to the care of the patient with genitourinary disease and, therefore, encourages the proper use of APPs.

show abstract

“…Several researchers have found the influence and relationship between wages and labor absorption (e.g., Ariga & Kambayashi, 2010;Baek & Park, 2016;Dickson & Fongoni, 2019;Holtemöller & Pohle, 2019;Li et al, 2018;Perugini & Pompei, 2016). The influence between wages and employment can be realized as long as regulation, job security, and aggregate demand for labor can take place positively.…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of wage increases can harm the development of the business climate where one of the adverse effects caused after the determination of the minimum wage increase is the staff retrenchment (PHK) which can macro-impact on high unemployment and sluggish macroeconomic growth, including the growth of the economic sector, which will in turn have an impact on the consumption by the community itself (Böhm, 1978;Sasaki et al, 2013;Du & Wang, 2019;Greiner et al, 2004;Lankisch et al, 2019;Okudaira et al, 2019). Several studies have made the variable wage a hot issue discussed among researchers who link wages and employment (e.g., Ariga & Kambayashi, 2010;Baek & Park, 2016;Dickson & Fongoni, 2019;Holtemöller & Pohle, 2019;Li et al, 2018;Perugini & Pompei, 2016). From the economic theory and wage theory, there is causality between wages and labor absorption.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Indonesia Economics Works: Correlation Analysis of Macroeconomics in 2010 - 2019

Olilingo¹,

Putra²

2020

JAFEB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to provide benefits and ethically-rooted managerial implications based on theoretical underpinnings through an empirical study using correlation between wages, bank credit, government expenditure on economic growth, and employment via a case study in Indonesia. Besides that, managerial implications strive to provide benefits to the government regarding the importance of establishing effective and pro-development regulations to realize economic growth and employment through the efficient role of wages, bank credit, and government spending. This study uses secondary macroeconomic data from the period 2010-2019 with analysis using the correlation test with the Pearson correlation method. Out of eight hypotheses tested, two hypotheses do not have a significant correlation. The details of the statistical results obtained the following correlations: the correlation between bank credit and wages has a significant, but indirect (negative) correlation. However, the correlation between bank credit and economic growth has a direct and significant (positive) correlation. Government expenditure correlates positively with wages, but correlates negatively with bank credit. Wages are positively correlated with economic growth, but have no significant effect on employment. Finally, economic growth has a positive correlation with government expenditure, but does not have a significant correlation with employment.

show abstract

Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Wage Differences by Employment Setting

Abstract: A large, unexplained wage difference exists between PCNPs working in primary care and specialty care settings.

Cited by 7 publications

References 37 publications

Earnings, job satisfaction, and turnover of nurse practitioners across employment settings

Earnings, job satisfaction, and turnover of nurse practitioners across employment settings

Current State of Advanced Practice Providers in Urological Practice

How Indonesia Economics Works: Correlation Analysis of Macroeconomics in 2010 - 2019

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About