Primary care physicians’ attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework

Abstract

BackgroundRecent decades have seen rapid growth in the implementation of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in healthcare settings in both developed regions as well as low and middle income countries. Yet despite substantial investment, the implementation of EMRs in some primary care systems has lagged behind other settings, with piecemeal adoption of EMR functionality by primary care physicians (PCPs) themselves. We aimed to review and synthesise international literature on the attitudes of PCPs to EMR adoption using the Clinical Adoption (CA) Framework.MethodsMEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched from 1st January 1996 to 1st August 2017 for studies investigating PCP attitudes towards EMR adoption. Papers were screened by two independent reviewers, and eligible studies selected for further assessment. Findings were categorised against the CA Framework and the quality of studies assessed against one of three appropriate tools.ResultsOut of 2263 potential articles, 33 were included, based in North and South America, Europe, Middle East and Hong Kong. Concerns about the accessibility, reliability and EMR utility exerted an adverse influence on PCPs’ attitudes to adoption. However many were positive about their potential to improve clinical productivity, patient safety and care quality. Younger, computer-literate PCPs, based in large/multi-group practices, were more likely to be positively inclined to EMR use than older physicians, less-skilled in technology use, based in solo practices. Adequate training, policies and procedures favourably impacted on PCPs’ views on EMR implementation. Financial factors were common system level influencers shaping EMR adoption, from start-up costs to the resources required by ongoing use.ConclusionsBy using the CA Framework to synthesise the evidence, we identified a linked series of factors influencing PCPs attitudes to EMR adoption. Findings underline the need to involve end-users in future implementation programmes from the outset, to avoid the development of an EMR which is neither feasible nor acceptable for use in practice.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016038790.

Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review

“…An EHR provides a longitudinal record of information regarding the health status of an individual in computer-processible form across practices and specialists, and enables authorised access to clinical records in real-time 4 , 5 . As well as expanding the capacity to utilise clinical data for monitoring of patient outcomes and conducting audits and research 6 , 7 , the EHR provides access to patient information in a timely manner, enabling healthcare professionals (HCPs) to spend more time with patients 8 , reducing duplication of tests and work, and improving the safety and quality of care provided 4 , 7 , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] . Additionally, integration of other functions and software, such as clinical decision support and bar code medication administration, further expand its potential benefits 15 , 16 .…”

The Development and Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record Efficiency Workshop for Providers

“…Improvement in EHR confidence and efficiency have been shown to be possible outcomes of training. 16,17 However, in a study by Rathert and colleagues, 18 participants felt that training was insufficient with EHRs that posed a subsequent barrier to care coordination and communication. Upon hire, initial training must not only be retained to memory but ongoing training for routine system updates and upgrades is necessary, as the systems are further enhanced.…”

Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: A qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory

“…Global evidence exists for the potential impact of EHR implementations to improve record quality, increase administration efficiency, and support better quality, safety and coordination of care [1,3,4]. However, there is growing recognition that implementing an EHR across complex hospital care systems remains a major challenge world-wide [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10], with it estimated that more than half of all systems fail, or fail to be properly utilised [11]. Progress in EHR implementation in the United Kingdom (UK) secondary care hospitals has been particularly slow [11][12][13][14][15], with previous negative experiences contributing to a disengaged workforce.…”