1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00020-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary care reform: a three country comparison of `budget holding'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a research by Barnum et al in 1995, payment level and unit and the time of payment as well as different payment systems (fee-for-service and capitation) and their strong and weak points were implied. Capitation payment method in national medicine system of England (Robinson & Grand, 1994), Argentina (World Bank Report, 1998), New Zealand (Wilton & Smith, 1998), and the United States (Feachem, 2000) has become operational. According to the World Health Organization Report in 2000, buyers must shift from payment mechanisms based on fee-for-service payment to those mechanisms covering risk; it is in accordance with the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a research by Barnum et al in 1995, payment level and unit and the time of payment as well as different payment systems (fee-for-service and capitation) and their strong and weak points were implied. Capitation payment method in national medicine system of England (Robinson & Grand, 1994), Argentina (World Bank Report, 1998), New Zealand (Wilton & Smith, 1998), and the United States (Feachem, 2000) has become operational. According to the World Health Organization Report in 2000, buyers must shift from payment mechanisms based on fee-for-service payment to those mechanisms covering risk; it is in accordance with the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the advantages of capitation system in controlling costs, capitation method is used in some organizations purchasing services in the world. This method has become operational in England National Medicine (Robinson & Grand, 1994), and the network of service providers in Social Security Organization of Argentina (World Bank Report, 1998), non-affiliated organizations in New Zealand (Wilton & Smith, 1998) and the organizations of health care providers in the United States (Feachem, 2000).…”
Section: Appropriate Payment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MCO structures differ quite significantly [20], they share a number of common characteristics, including budgetary arrangements through which care for the designated (frequently enrolled) population is to be provided, and risk-sharing arrangements with the physician as 'gatekeeper' to the MCO. Although the method of remuneration differs across MCOs, the key underlying incentives remain; that efficiency is encouraged through budgetary arrangements which ensure physicians stand to 'gain/lose' from the resource implications of care prescribed [22]. For instance, physicians in MCOs may: (a) have budget-holding responsibilities (i.e.…”
Section: United States Of Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade health restructuring in New Zealand has promoted 'managed' competition amongst providers and suppliers in the sector [7]. Of particular importance has been the establishment of 'budget holding' by IPAs within an incentive framework of retained savings for new services [8].…”
Section: Premec and The New Zealand Health Care Environment 1990-2000mentioning
confidence: 99%