1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-84269-6_158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Charge Separation in the Photosynthesis of Bacterial Reaction Centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these predicted anisotropies are not observed one can conclude that the observed signals are probably not due to transitions to |P + B L -〉. The kinetics that are observed do not show any significant contribution from the 0.9 ps kinetic component that is associated 13,[63][64][65] with the formation of P + Hfrom P + B -, thereby ruling out that appreciable transient absorption is seen from |P + B L -〉 to higher lying states.…”
Section: Interpretations Involving P + Bmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since these predicted anisotropies are not observed one can conclude that the observed signals are probably not due to transitions to |P + B L -〉. The kinetics that are observed do not show any significant contribution from the 0.9 ps kinetic component that is associated 13,[63][64][65] with the formation of P + Hfrom P + B -, thereby ruling out that appreciable transient absorption is seen from |P + B L -〉 to higher lying states.…”
Section: Interpretations Involving P + Bmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…-. There is considerable experimental evidence 13,[63][64][65] that the state P + Bis a shortlived (0.9 ps) but real intermediate in the electron transfer from P* to P + H -. Independent of whether P + Bis a real intermediate or a state that is involved in a superexchange mechanism, some of the signals we observe might be related to it.…”
Section: Interpretations Involving P + Bmentioning
confidence: 99%