1988
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(88)90110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary decomposition of divisorial ideals in Mori domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) It is clear that P + S P is the maximal proper prime ideal of S P . Since S is a Mori semigroup and P is divisorial (by (5)), the proof of (6) is similar to [17,Proposition 1.1].…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(6) It is clear that P + S P is the maximal proper prime ideal of S P . Since S is a Mori semigroup and P is divisorial (by (5)), the proof of (6) is similar to [17,Proposition 1.1].…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Proposition 2.11. Hence if A is not Archimedean, then there is a n element .r E A n U(A*) \ U(A), and for any prime ideal P of A with [HLV,Theorem 2.11. We claim that (a,b)B # B. Granting the claim, let Q be a prime of B with a, b E Q.…”
Section: Lying Over In Almost Integral Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Suppose that we take l = 1 in Family 1 or 3, so M 2 is universal. For n < 100, this gives local CK domains with M 2 universal for n = 1, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,17,18,20,21,24,26,28,30,31,32,33,38,40,42,44,48 [10] and Clark, Govasi, and Pollack [7] gave some examples in characteristic 0 from number theory. We begin with this following example.…”
Section: Familymentioning
confidence: 99%