2013
DOI: 10.1002/rrq.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Discourse and Expressive Oral Language in a Kindergarten Student

Abstract: This seven‐month ethnographic case study elucidated a kindergarten student's navigation through her first formal schooling experience with relation to expressive oral language. Gee's theory of Discourses and methodology of discourse analysis were used to examine expressive oral language in use. Two discursive contexts germane to expressive oral language were observed: Discourse of home and Discourse of school. This study demonstrated the complexity of expressive oral language when a primary Discourse converged… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bringing together "funds of knowledge" and Discourses meant that the action research project itself necessarily emphasized the importance of not simply acknowledging children's "background knowledge," but worked to identify what funds of knowledge they had access to at home and how these could be explicitly recognized and valued in classrooms in order to help students operate more effectively in the secondary Discourse of their school (cf. Fiano, 2013;Hedges, 2011;Moje et al, 2004). Gee (2015) explains it is not enough for students to adapt to and learn school-based Discourse, but that the school must include and value the students' primary Discourses as well.…”
Section: A Brief Description Of the Action Research Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bringing together "funds of knowledge" and Discourses meant that the action research project itself necessarily emphasized the importance of not simply acknowledging children's "background knowledge," but worked to identify what funds of knowledge they had access to at home and how these could be explicitly recognized and valued in classrooms in order to help students operate more effectively in the secondary Discourse of their school (cf. Fiano, 2013;Hedges, 2011;Moje et al, 2004). Gee (2015) explains it is not enough for students to adapt to and learn school-based Discourse, but that the school must include and value the students' primary Discourses as well.…”
Section: A Brief Description Of the Action Research Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the discipline of early childhood education mainly investigates the educational aspects of preschool-aged children's language, such as how to deal with preschool-aged children in classroom settings (Dalgren, 2017;Geary & Berch, 2016;Hornby, 2011;McCabe et al, 2000) and how the curriculum accommodates preschool-aged children's language development (Dickinson & Porche, 2011;Dwyer & Harbaugh, 2018;Justice et al, 2011). In linguistics, the discussions are quite more various, from language development in general (Becker et al, 2013;Fiano, 2014), to the structural and pragmatic aspects of the development (Carmiol & Vinden, 2013;D. K. Oller et al, 2013;Sorsana et al, 2013;Wasik & Iannone-Campbell, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies were already conducted on these early acquisition strategies. Some are focusing on the productive aspects of language acquisition (Sorsana et al, 2013;Stemberger, 2014;Yang, 2016), comprehension strategy (Mitchell & Brady, 2013;Rakoczy & Tomasello, 2009;Wagner et al, 2010), functional definition strategy (Batson-Magnuson, 2017;Fiano, 2014;Negen & Sarnecka, 2012), imitation and repetition strategy (Oller et al, 2013;Santos et al, 2015;Sidnell, 2010a), and questioning strategy (Bova & Arcidiacono, 2013;Chouinard, 2007;Rowland, 2007). In the Indonesian context, although there were not many studies on these strategies, there is a study by Solehuddin, Gunawan, & Kurniawan (2019), revealing that preschool children's productive strategy is marked by the awareness of inflection and derivation in Indonesian morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%