2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Exeter Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Small Femurs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have considered that massive subsidence may be related to splitting of the cement mantle and some movement between the cement and graft and that early massive subsidence may result from a failure to obtain initial stability. Concerning the sizes of the stems, we used two smaller stems [AP1 (30 mm), AP2 (33 mm)] that were developed in Hong Kong for small femurs in Asian patients [2] (Table 4). The body weights and heights of the South Korean patients in our study (average: 56 kg and 157 cm, respectively) were smaller than those of Western patients; femur stems smaller than the usual stem [no.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have considered that massive subsidence may be related to splitting of the cement mantle and some movement between the cement and graft and that early massive subsidence may result from a failure to obtain initial stability. Concerning the sizes of the stems, we used two smaller stems [AP1 (30 mm), AP2 (33 mm)] that were developed in Hong Kong for small femurs in Asian patients [2] (Table 4). The body weights and heights of the South Korean patients in our study (average: 56 kg and 157 cm, respectively) were smaller than those of Western patients; femur stems smaller than the usual stem [no.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subsequent 5 years following its availability, CDH or smaller stems were used in 73.2% of Exeter total hip arthroplasties [3]. No stem failure was observed at the time of Chiu's reporting [3,4]. Fujita [20], Sivananthan [21], and Tai [22] from different Asian centers also reported their results of small Exeter stem implanted for primary and revision total hip arthroplasties, with no stem fracture observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…5) have been made available to this population since 1998. In the subsequent 5 years following its availability, CDH or smaller stems were used in 73.2% of Exeter total hip arthroplasties [3]. No stem failure was observed at the time of Chiu's reporting [3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,3,[8][9][10] Nonetheless, it is important to match the prosthesis size to achieve Table 2 Distal contact in femurs with a 150-mm versus 125-mm rasp optimal outcome. 11 In patients with a narrow femoral canal, the 150-mm stem is too wide and necessitates additional reaming to remove the cancellous bone including the strongest trabecular bone near the corticocancellous bone junction (within 3 mm of the cortex), which is the ideal bed for cement fixation. 12 Many of the femoral components are too large for patients with a small femoral canal, resulting in cement mantle <2 mm thick.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%