The economic sustainability of public health and the burden of inappropriate admissions A major challenge faced by modern public health systems is the provision of affordable high-quality medical care. The availability of expensive pharmacological treatments and medical devices has pushed the economic boundaries of healthcare, making the management of limited economic resources critical (1). From an organizational point of view, hospital admissions are defined as inappropriate when clinical cases could be addressed at a less intensive level of care, with equal effectiveness and greater economic use of resources. Furthermore, hospital admission of fragile and comorbid patients worsens their quality of life, possibly resulting in nosocomial infections (2). Appropriateness has been identified as the "next frontier" in clinical practice development: a scenario in which doctors act according to established clinical-organizational guidelines, with economic reimbursement advantages, while respecting individual patient needs.
The Italian lawInappropriate hospital admissions arise from diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) of low complexity that could be managed by outpatient services with the same clinical outcomes and lower resource consumption according to "Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri" of Novembre 29th, 2001. 1 The law cites 43 DRGs in the Level of Essential Assistance (LEA), which should be provided at a medical assistance level lower than that provided by hospitalization. The transfer of cases managed in the traditional regime, toward less intensive and less costly assistance is influenced by either clinical (severity, presence of other diseases, and level of self-sufficiency) (1) or sociodemographic aspects (economic condition of the family, presence of caregiver support, advanced age, and level of education) (3, 4).