2016
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary healthcare use during follow-up after curative treatment for colorectal cancer

Abstract: The rising number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is likely to impose a burden on healthcare systems. Effective resource allocation between primary and hospital care to ensure ongoing high-quality care is under discussion. Therefore, it is important to understand the current role of GPs during follow-up care of CRC. This study explores the primary healthcare use of patients 2-6 years after CRC treatment. Annual rates of face-to-face contacts, prescribed medication and referrals were compared between CRC p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased activity in general practice has been documented for up to 6 years after cancer treatment, which suggests that the GP plays an important role in cancer follow-up (Brandenbarg et al, 2017). Formal involvement of general practice in cancer survivor care may benefit from this.…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased activity in general practice has been documented for up to 6 years after cancer treatment, which suggests that the GP plays an important role in cancer follow-up (Brandenbarg et al, 2017). Formal involvement of general practice in cancer survivor care may benefit from this.…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increased consultation rates are in line with findings of several studies regarding primary healthcare use among patients with cancer. 3,4,[8][9][10]18 A Dutch study comprising several cancer types found that, compared with matched controls, patients with cancer had significantly more GP consultations (3.5 versus 2.7 per year). 18 A UK study found that patients with breast and colorectal cancer had one more GP consultation per year compared with controls, up to 5 years after diagnosis for breast cancer, and up to 9 years for colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Other, Dutch studies found that patients with colorectal cancer had 54% more face-to-face contacts with GPs compared with reference patients in the first year after diagnosis, 8 as well as significantly more face-to-face contacts in the second, third, and sixth year after diagnosis. 3 Studies trying to explain the cause of the increased consultation rates among patients with cancer have shown conflicting results. Jabaaij et al found that patients with cancer more often had a chronic comorbid condition than their matched controls, and concluded that having a chronic condition increased healthcare use.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations