1995
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199507000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Mandibular Reconstruction with the Titanium Hollow Screw Reconstruction Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While initially developed for use with the titanium hollowscrew osseointegrating reconstruction plate (THORP), this system was eventually supplanted by modern LRMPs secondary to concerns about the THORP large screw diameter, plate profile height, and characteristics of the osteointegrated locking screws that made hardware removal difficult. 6,15 The locking system enables the screw to achieve rigid fixation of the bone graft to the plate without a need for compression of the bone graft. The LMRP acts much like an internal-external fixator.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While initially developed for use with the titanium hollowscrew osseointegrating reconstruction plate (THORP), this system was eventually supplanted by modern LRMPs secondary to concerns about the THORP large screw diameter, plate profile height, and characteristics of the osteointegrated locking screws that made hardware removal difficult. 6,15 The locking system enables the screw to achieve rigid fixation of the bone graft to the plate without a need for compression of the bone graft. The LMRP acts much like an internal-external fixator.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem associated with conventional plate systems is the frequent incidence of complications such as screw loosening, plate exposure and plate fractures once masticatory function is recovered (Table 1, Irish et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been employed in mandibular reconstruction after the surgical removal of ameloblastoma 5,9,12 . The tissue most commonly used to reconstruct the lost osseous tissue is bone, especially in cases of subtotal or segmental mandibulectomy 5,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a serious reduction in the quality of life of the patients following total mandibulectomy, regarding feeding, speech, appearance and saliva control as a result of lack of lip support. In cases of subtotal mandibulectomy it is easier for surgeons to reconstruct the lost hard tissue immediately after the surgical procedure for improved aesthetics and to improve the quality of life of the patient 4,8,9 . Following total mandibulectomy, the means for reconstructing lost tissues is very limited, especially in a developing country, and the overall result is an increase in postoperative morbidity (Figs 5 and 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%