1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Motor Cortex Influences on the Descending and Ascending Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
149
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 469 publications
7
149
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, aMF showed adaptations in cases of severe lesions to the PT (Belhaj-Saif and Cheney 2000; Lindenberg et al 2010;Rüber et al 2012). Overall, this would support the notion that the PT might be more involved in the execution and control of finegrained distal finger movements, while aMF might be more involved in proximal motor control and that aMF only show adaptations in response to distal motor requirements when the PT system is damaged (Canedo 1997;Lemon 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, aMF showed adaptations in cases of severe lesions to the PT (Belhaj-Saif and Cheney 2000; Lindenberg et al 2010;Rüber et al 2012). Overall, this would support the notion that the PT might be more involved in the execution and control of finegrained distal finger movements, while aMF might be more involved in proximal motor control and that aMF only show adaptations in response to distal motor requirements when the PT system is damaged (Canedo 1997;Lemon 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We not only examined the pyramidal tract (PT), but also so-called alternate motor fibers (aMF). These aMF might comprise the cortico-rubro-spinal and the cortico-reticulo-spinal tracts (Canedo 1997). They have been found to play an important role and show adaptations in motor recovery after lesions to the PT (Lindenberg et al 2010;Rüber et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the geometric reorientation process and the process for locating objects with respect to movable landmarks (not discussed in the target article but a focus of Biegler & Morris 1993;and Hermer-Vazquez et al 2001), are again two mechanisms among many with partly overlapping functionality. It is becoming increasingly clear that living organisms possess multiple, partly redundant, and partly unique coding and control mechanisms, all the way from the genetic level (Lobe & Nagy 1998;White 2002) to the level of large-scale neural circuits (Canedo 1997;McDonald & White 1993). In support of this for the cognitive level, young children conjoin geometric and nongeometric information to reorient themselves in larger environments (Learmonth et al 2001; in press), and rats eventually learn to locate an object in the correct spatial relationship to a movable landmark (Biegler & Morris 1996).…”
Section: Viewing Cognitive Mechanisms In the Context Of Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second aim was to examine the effects induced on mvCN projection neurons by electrically stimulating the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NRGc) and the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR), two structures anatomically interconnected, receiving polysensory input, and implicated in sensorimotor integration (Armstrong, 1988;Whelan, 1996;Canedo, 1997;Jordan, 1998;Takakusaki et al, 2003;Winn, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%