2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0222-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary neuroendocrine breast cancer, how much do we know so far?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
33
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The definite feature that makes the diagnosis of primary is intraductal component of NET, as metastatic NET has no intraductal component [3,4]. Based on this finding, we advise screening of other sites using different imaging modalities once the diagnosis of metastatic NET is suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The definite feature that makes the diagnosis of primary is intraductal component of NET, as metastatic NET has no intraductal component [3,4]. Based on this finding, we advise screening of other sites using different imaging modalities once the diagnosis of metastatic NET is suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Primary breast NET comprise <2% of all primary breast cancers (Table 1) [1,[4][5][6]. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified primary NET of the breast as tumors with expression of one or more immunohistochemical markers (neuron specific enolase, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin) in at least 50% of the tumor cells [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sapino et al [7] commented that benign neoplastic neuroendocrine lesions of the breast have not been described, and that all neuroendocrine lesions in the breast are considered to be carcinomas. In 2012, Alkaied et al [8] presented a detailed review of all previous literature about primary NEC. No neuroendocrine cells have been detected in normal human mammary cells studied by immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%