Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a common outpatient condition encountered by neurosurgeons and neurologists. With advancements in endovascular stenting technology and catheters along with the growing body of literature in support for venous stenting, the interventional neuroradiology community is becoming increasingly involved in this disease process. 1,2 A 2019 meta-analysis evaluating venous sinus stenting in patients with medically refractory IIH demonstrated an excellent safety profile, as well as improvements in headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and papilledema. 1 Many authors have cited the benefits of stenting over traditional invasive techniques (i.e. optic nerve sheath fenestration and cerebrospinal fluid diversion). 3,4 We read the recent technical description by Schwarz et al. with great interest. The authors describe a technique for traversing through stenotic segments of the dural venous sinuses using a balloon to help reduce the discrepancy between the size of the intermediate (usually a 0.072") or micro catheters and the area of stenosis. 5 As they note, aggressive maneuvers otherwise used to cross venous stenosis could lead to devastating complications. The authors note they have used this technique in 30 patients undergoing venous sinus stenting without complications.In regard to its utility, it should be noted that this technique is routinely used by our interventional cardiology colleagues and is known as "balloon-assisted tracking." [6][7][8][9] It is also described in the peripheral endovascular literature as the "battering-balloon" technique (notably, this is how we refer to it at our institution, as an homage to battering rams used in medieval times). 10 We have had similar results and find that this technique is both safe and effective, allowing us to gain access beyond areas of stenosis without causing hemorrhagic complications or dissections (Video). The concept of avoiding aggressive loading of the catheters by using a balloon is critical in crossing these lesions. We are writing this letter in support of the technique described by our colleagues and its use in venous stenting and hope to add to the cerebrovascular literature regarding its utility.