2009
DOI: 10.1021/ic901018s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Phosphines Studied by Gas-Phase Electron Diffraction and Quantum Chemical Calculations. Are They Different from Amines?

Abstract: The molecular structures of allyl-, allenyl-, propargyl-, vinyl-, ethynyl-, phenyl-, benzyl-, and chloromethyl-phosphine have been determined from gas-phase electron diffraction data employing the SARACEN method. The experimental geometric parameters are compared with those obtained using ab initio calculations performed at the MP2 level using both Pople-type basis sets and the correlation-consistent basis sets of Dunning. The structure and conformational behavior of each molecule have been analyzed and, where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few aryl–As rotational barriers are known, in general, aryl–X rotational barriers decrease as the atomic radius of X increases . The rotational barriers calculated for aryl–P bonds are low (1–3.74 kcal·mol –1 depending on aryl substituent), suggesting that the As–aryl rotational barrier in ReAsH is accessible at room temperature, with a substantial number of molecules (15.6%–0.2%, assuming a Boltzmann distribution of states) populating even the least favorable rotamer. , But more importantly, the rotationally restricted model predicts that the lifetime of the ReAsH-EDT 2 excited state will be shorter than that of ReAsH bound to a protein where little or no rotation (and thus little or no quenching) can occur. Although the excited-state lifetime of ReAsH-EDT 2 has not been reported, the reported excited-state lifetimes of FlAsH bound to the α 2A adrenergic receptor or the peptide FLN­CCP­GCC­MEP are between 4 and 5 ns. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although few aryl–As rotational barriers are known, in general, aryl–X rotational barriers decrease as the atomic radius of X increases . The rotational barriers calculated for aryl–P bonds are low (1–3.74 kcal·mol –1 depending on aryl substituent), suggesting that the As–aryl rotational barrier in ReAsH is accessible at room temperature, with a substantial number of molecules (15.6%–0.2%, assuming a Boltzmann distribution of states) populating even the least favorable rotamer. , But more importantly, the rotationally restricted model predicts that the lifetime of the ReAsH-EDT 2 excited state will be shorter than that of ReAsH bound to a protein where little or no rotation (and thus little or no quenching) can occur. Although the excited-state lifetime of ReAsH-EDT 2 has not been reported, the reported excited-state lifetimes of FlAsH bound to the α 2A adrenergic receptor or the peptide FLN­CCP­GCC­MEP are between 4 and 5 ns. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle this effect could be between the phosphorus lone pair and the aromatic system, or simply within the aromatic system itself, or both. In considering this, we take into account the following: (1) conjugation of the phosphino group and aromatic rings has been a most contentious issue in the literature [15,[46][47][48][49]; (2) both 1-naphthyl and 2-naphthyl substitution lead to a similar stabilization, whereas a conjugative effect to the lone pair might be expected to show a difference; (3) there appears to be no simple relationship between the basicity of the phosphine (as defined in terms of its effect on transition metal-bound carbonyls) and its airstability, which would again imply that the phosphorus 'lone pair' is not involved in the factors imparting the air-stability; (4) a higher oxidation potential of the phosphine seems to correlate with greater air-stability; (5) PES studies [46][47][48] have To understand this issue in more detail we have undertaken molecular modeling studies of many relevant primary phosphines [50]. The geometry optimizations of each of the phosphines were performed in the gas phase at the DFT level of theory using the B3LYP functional with a 6-31G * basis set, as employed in the Spartan '06 Essential edition from Wavefunction, Inc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rP-C i was determined to be 187.4(4) pm, fitting with the P-C bond length in gauche-iso-propylphosphine P(iPr)H 2 [187.7(1) pm]. 29 Even this P-C bond length shows no influence of the electron-withdrawing effect from the chlorine atoms on the silicon atom when compared with P(iPr) Cl 2 [184.7 (13) pm]. 28 It has been previously reported for P(tBu) 2 (SiCl 3 ) 7 and P(tBu)(SiCl 3 ) 2 11 that the angles at the phosphorus atom are all smaller than tetrahedral (∼109.5°), caused by the influence of the high p-orbital contribution to these bonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample of iso-propyl(tert-butyl)(trichlorosilyl)phosphine (1) was synthesised by W.-W. du Mont (Braunschweig, Germany). 7 The purity of the sample was checked by 1 H NMR, 29 Si NMR, and 31 P NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%