1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001670050081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament in combined injury of the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments

Abstract: We describe our experiences with 22 patients who underwent acute surgical intervention for complete combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) in our hospital. In all patients, an arthroscopically guided repair of the MCL was performed, while the torn ACL was treated non-surgically. Primary reconstruction of the MCL in patients with complete disruptions of the MCL complex as well as the ACL reduces combined anteromedial instability to an isolated problem of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the muscle atrophy, derangement, and scar healing, the high grade MCL injury could not gain a satisfactory clinical result as good as low grade MCL injury without concomitant structure injury [24]. So some authors advocated acute surgical repair or reconstruction for cases with grade III or above laxity [13, 16, 25]. Dong et al put forward similar point that 3° MCL injury could hardly yield a satisfactory result if only with revision scarring and incomplete healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the muscle atrophy, derangement, and scar healing, the high grade MCL injury could not gain a satisfactory clinical result as good as low grade MCL injury without concomitant structure injury [24]. So some authors advocated acute surgical repair or reconstruction for cases with grade III or above laxity [13, 16, 25]. Dong et al put forward similar point that 3° MCL injury could hardly yield a satisfactory result if only with revision scarring and incomplete healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetto and Marshall 2 demonstrated that 79% of mixed could be performed if conservative treatment of this ligament had failed. 26 Others prefer to decide whether to treat the medial structures operatively depending on the extent of injury to the medial side of the knee. In a study by Shirakura and colleagues a group of 14 ACL/MCL injuries with grade III MCL tears that demonstrated anterior subluxation of the medial tibial plateau during laxity tests under anesthesia received suture repair with ligament stapling of the medialsided structures without ACL reconstruction.…”
Section: Combined Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at longer term (52 weeks), the advantages of the MCL repair on the biomechanical properties of the FMTC disappeared [30,237]. Therefore, it is apparent that only reconstruction of the ACL is necessary after a combined injury due to the important role the ACL plays in maintaining valgus instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%