BackgroundRenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R‐NEN) are exceptionally rare tumours characterized by high mortality rates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to analyse prognostic factors and treatment impact on overall survival in patients with R‐NEN.Design, setting and participantsWe identified all patients with R‐NEN in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 and identified prognostic factors for improved survival.Results and limitationsOf 542 R‐NEN cases, 166 (31%) were neuroendocrine tumour grade 1 (NET‐G1), 14 (3%) were neuroendocrine tumour grade 2 (NET‐G2), 169 (31%) were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC‐NOS), 18 (3%) were large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LC‐NEC) and 175 (32%) were small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SC‐NEC). Median overall survival for all patients in the study was 44.88 months (SE, 4.265; 95% CI, 27.57–62.19). Median overall survival was 7.89 months (SE 0.67; 95% CI, 6.58–9.20) for patients without surgical intervention and 136.61 months (SE 16.44; 95% CI, 104.38–168.84, p < 0.001) for patients who underwent surgery. Increased age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03–1.06; p < 0.001), T4 stage disease (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.96–5.1; p < 0.001), NEC‐NOS histology (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.64–4.86; p < 0.001), LC‐NEC histology (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.04–7.17; p = 0.041) and SC‐NEC histology (HR, 5.17; 95% CI, 2.95–9.05; p < 0.001) were all positive predictors of worsening overall survival. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design.ConclusionR‐NEN is an aggressive tumour characterized by high mortality rates. Surgery continues to be the mainstay of treatment and has shown to provide a survival benefit for most patients.Patient SummaryR‐NEN is composed of several tumour histologies that differ based on their aggressiveness with NEC‐NOS and SC‐NEC being the most lethal. Surgery, predominantly through minimally invasive approaches, is the mainstay of treatment and has a clear survival benefit.