2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary school interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
111
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also consistent with what was reported in other studies [17,[22][23][24]. The study by Sweitzer et al [9] performed in Texas, observed a significant increase in the intake of vegetables, from 0.41 to 0.65 (p \ 0.001), and of whole grains, from 0.54 to 1.06 (p \ 0.001), among those in the IG, after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are also consistent with what was reported in other studies [17,[22][23][24]. The study by Sweitzer et al [9] performed in Texas, observed a significant increase in the intake of vegetables, from 0.41 to 0.65 (p \ 0.001), and of whole grains, from 0.54 to 1.06 (p \ 0.001), among those in the IG, after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A number of reviews of school programs to improve fruit and vegetable consumption have been conducted (47)(48)(49)(50)(51), 2 studies of which have included a meta-analysis that enabled the impact of programs to be quantified. Of the 2 reviews that included a meta-analysis, one review included a small number of studies (51), and one review pooled studies in which fruit and vegetable intake was assessed either over the school day or over the whole day, which resulted in a high level of heterogeneity between studies (47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 2 reviews that included a meta-analysis, one review included a small number of studies (51), and one review pooled studies in which fruit and vegetable intake was assessed either over the school day or over the whole day, which resulted in a high level of heterogeneity between studies (47). This latter review may have overestimated the impact of programs because it did not take into account the fact that children may potentially increase their consumption of fruit and vegetables while at school and compensate with reductions in home consumption (52).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most reviews of fruit and vegetable intake tend to focus on children aged 5 and over, reporting intakes of both food groups (e.g. Blanchette & Brug, 2005;Delgado-Noguera, Tort, Martinez-Zapata, & Bonfill, 2011;Diep, Chen, Davies, Baranowski, & Baranowski, 2014;Evans et al, 2012;French & Stables, 2003;Krolner et al, 2011;Rasmussen et al, 2006). A systematic research review by Appleton et al (2016) described vegetable promoting interventions across the lifespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%