2020
DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2020.07.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the salivary gland: immunohistochemical analysis and comparison with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the salivary gland is a rare disease, and distinguishing primary SCC from metastatic SCC is difficult. This study investigated the histological and immunohistochemical differences between primary and metastatic salivary gland SCC to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and to explore the pathogenesis of this disease. Methods Data of 16 patients who underwent surgery for SCC of salivary glands between 2000 and 2018 at Asan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCC and high grade MEC have similar histopathologic features and presence of intermediate and mucus cells are the only key for differentiation [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCC and high grade MEC have similar histopathologic features and presence of intermediate and mucus cells are the only key for differentiation [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,9 Primary or secondary/metastatic SCC is usually a diagnosis of exclusion, which is usually ruled out by the presence of the classical, "breast carcinoma-like" infiltrating, glandular pattern of SDC. 10,11 In the current case, however, relying solely on morphology presented a potential diagnostic pitfall, since there was no SDC component seen in either the initial primary site biopsy or contralateral neck lymph node or skin metastases. Ancillary IHC studies can be particularly helpful in these instances, since the majority of SDC show strong AR nuclear expression (85%) and cytoplasmic gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) (66%-80%), and low molecular weight cytokeratins like CAM5.2 (46%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Ancillary IHC studies can be particularly helpful in these instances, since the majority of SDC show strong AR nuclear expression (85%) and cytoplasmic gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) (66%-80%), and low molecular weight cytokeratins like CAM5.2 (46%). 1,3,6,7,9,10 Although primary SCC of the parotid can show AR positivity in 25% of cases, 2 primary cases of SCC of the parotid are exceedingly rare and therefore the more likely distinction will be between an AR-negative skin SCC metastasis to the parotid and an AR-positive primary SDC. High molecular weight cytokeratins like CK5/6 and CK903 can be helpful when evaluating for an in situ component of SDC, which shows reactivity in its basal layer analogous to its utility in evaluating ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) of the breast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this day, differentiation between primary SCC of the salivary glands and metastatic disease cannot securely be achieved by histology or immunohistochemistry [10]. Whole genome sequencing with mutational analysis may be beneficial in making this distinction [11].…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Primary Scc Of the Salivary Glands And Metastatic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is technically very demanding. Most studies that address this issue [10,12] commonly take a clinical approach: first, a thorough research on previous mucosal or cutaneous SCC that, in terms of time and location, could act as primary tumors of a salivary SCC metastasis, was conducted. Then, if such a primary tumor was found in the anamnesis, the salivary tumor was considered to be a metastasis.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Primary Scc Of the Salivary Glands And Metastatic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%