1995
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary stent placement for chronic iliac artery occlusions: follow-up results in 103 patients.

Abstract: Primary stent placement should be the treatment of choice in unilateral chronic iliac artery occlusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
4
10

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
88
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, rapid advances in endovascular surgery have significantly changed the patterns of vascular reconstruction. Recent studies on stenting for iliac artery stenosis and occlusion show 3-year primary patency rates of 69% to 92% and 64% to 90%, respectively [18][19][20][21][22] , whereas the 2-year primary patency rate of stenting for superficial femoral artery stenosis or occlusion is reported to be 60% to 69%. [23][24][25][26] However, endovascular surgery has less favorable outcomes for some lower extremity arteries, such as the common femoral and deep femoral arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rapid advances in endovascular surgery have significantly changed the patterns of vascular reconstruction. Recent studies on stenting for iliac artery stenosis and occlusion show 3-year primary patency rates of 69% to 92% and 64% to 90%, respectively [18][19][20][21][22] , whereas the 2-year primary patency rate of stenting for superficial femoral artery stenosis or occlusion is reported to be 60% to 69%. [23][24][25][26] However, endovascular surgery has less favorable outcomes for some lower extremity arteries, such as the common femoral and deep femoral arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recently published data from animal investigations did not show significant differences regarding neointimal hyperplasia between the Palmaz stunt, Wallstent,andMemothermstuntin iliac arteries [31]. We acknowledgethat the number of stunts included in our investigation is rela tively small compared with the number of iliac arterial stunts in other studies [1, 4,5,7,19,21,22]. However, this is the first systematic in travascular sonography follow-up investiga tionof Memothermstunts to ourknowledge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The Strecker stunt (Boston Scien tific), a balloon-expanthble stunt made of knit ted tantalum wire, is more flexible and elastic comparedwith the Palmaz stunt and has corn parable patency rates in iliac arteries [5,20]. The first self-expanding stunt used in clinical practice for treatment of iliac artery stenosis or occlusionwith a 2-yearpatencyrateof approx imately 90% is the Wallstent (Schneider, Zur ich, Switzerland), a flexible and compliant stunt made of multiple stainless steel filaments [4,21,22]. All of thesestuntshavesimilar patency ratesand clinical successratesfor the iliac ar tery, and therefore the choice of stunt type is a question ofpersonal preference [23}.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DE may be treated with catheter aspiration, balloon inflation, stent placement, and occasionally, with surgical embolectomy. DE has been reported in most studies of iliac interventions; the incidence ranges from 0.4 to 9% [36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%