2000
DOI: 10.1080/14794800008520064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Teacher Trainees’ Mathematics Subject Knowledge and Classroom Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there is a particular recognition that the mathematical subject knowledge of teachers is an important factor in the teaching and learning of mathematics in the primary school (Williams 2008). Research has demonstrated a link between teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) and the quality of teaching and learning (Askew, Brown, Rhodes, Johnson, and Wiliam 1997;Turner-Bisset and Nichol 1998;Rowland, Martyn, Barber, and Heal 2000). The seminal work of Ma (1999) demonstrated that Chinese teachers with 'profound understanding of fundamental mathematics' (PUFM) were better equipped to teach elementary mathematics than their American counterparts, who lacked the same depth of knowledge.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, there is a particular recognition that the mathematical subject knowledge of teachers is an important factor in the teaching and learning of mathematics in the primary school (Williams 2008). Research has demonstrated a link between teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) and the quality of teaching and learning (Askew, Brown, Rhodes, Johnson, and Wiliam 1997;Turner-Bisset and Nichol 1998;Rowland, Martyn, Barber, and Heal 2000). The seminal work of Ma (1999) demonstrated that Chinese teachers with 'profound understanding of fundamental mathematics' (PUFM) were better equipped to teach elementary mathematics than their American counterparts, who lacked the same depth of knowledge.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Policy documents and position papers have consistently pointed out the importance of engaging students in doing mathematics in their classrooms (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM 2000); National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA and CCSSO 2010)). It seems reasonable to assume that teachers' mathematical knowledge is a key component in whether teachers are able to provide such opportunities for engagement to their students, yet studies related to this assumption have yielded mixed results (e.g., Rowland et al 2000;Tchoshanov 2011;. Mathematical knowledge, as conceptualized in these studies, does not sufficiently explain classroom instruction in mathematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, Rowland et al (2000) found that preservice elementary teachers who scored higher on an inventory of mathematical content knowledge received higher grades on their practice teaching lessons, and Tchoshanov (2011) found that teachers with a type of mathematics content knowledge that was rich and connected, as measured by a research-created survey instrument, presented higher quality lessons as measured by a classroom observation protocol. In contrast, reported a negative correlation between elementary teachers' content knowledge, as measured by an inventory of mathematical content knowledge, and their self-reported use of reform teaching practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise Aubrey (1997, p160) found that the subject knowledge of experienced teachers did not increase simply with teaching experience. Notwithstanding the complexity of teacher knowledge, Rowland, Martyn, Barber and Heal (2000) report on a study indicating that there is a positive association between mathematics subject knowledge (learner knowledge), and competence in teaching number among primary PGCE student teachers. The student teachers in Prestage and Perks' study were secondary mathematics specialists whose learner knowledge was considered adequate, allowing a focus on the transformation of that knowledge for the classroom.…”
Section: Student Teachers' Subject Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%