Abstract:Out of 262 hands with total finger amputations treated by replantation of finger/fingers from January 2001 until January 2006, there were only 6 cases of type III ring avulsion injuries, all of which were replanted. Radical resection of the damaged part of the artery with primary vein grafting was used in each case; only 1 artery and 2 veins were anastomosed for each finger. The survival rate was 100%. Mean total active motion was 195 degrees (ranging from 175 degrees to 220 degrees ). Mean 2-point discriminat… Show more
“…We extracted TAM data from 13 studies (4,5,9–11,15–17,19,23,33,34,39), and we extracted static 2PD data from 9 studies (4,5,9,11,15–17,34,39). All studies that reported TAM and 2PD data also reported survival outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two studies (16,23) explicitly stated that replantation was attempted on a total of four patients having complete avulsion injuries involving the proximal phalanx or PIP joint. The remainder of the studies did not specify the number of patients undergoing replantation, if any, who had injury proximal to the FDS insertion (5,9,19,33). In addition, studies by Kay et al (10) and Sanmartin et al (33) each reported no functional difference based on the level of injury in relation to the PIP joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As surgeons continued to push the boundaries of microsurgery, novel techniques were proposed to manage the difficulties of salvaging avulsed digits. Reconstruction of vessels with long vein grafts (4,5), venous flow-through flaps (6), or transfer of vessels from adjacent fingers (7,8) enhanced survival of the avulsed digit. Several classification systems (9–11) have evolved to categorize patients according to anticipated treatment and functional outcome (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbaniak has advocated for revision amputation to treat complete finger avulsion injuries (9,14). However, recent studies presenting functional outcomes after replantation of finger avulsion injuries have challenged this recommendation, with some authors achieving reasonable total active motion (TAM) approaching 200 degrees or greater after replantation of digital avulsion injuries (4,5,15,18–20). …”
Purpose
Recent studies presenting functional outcomes after replantation of finger avulsion injuries have challenged the historic practice of performing revision amputation for all complete finger avulsion injuries. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the English literature of replantation of finger avulsion injuries to provide best evidence of survival rates and functional outcomes.
Methods
A Medline literature search yielded 1398 studies using keywords of traumatic amputation or replantation with limitation to humans and finger injuries. Inclusion criteria required that studies meet the following requirements: (1) primary data are presented; (2) the study includes at least five cases with either complete or incomplete finger avulsion injuries at or distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint; (3) the study presents survival rates, total active arc of motion (TAM), or static two-point discrimination (2PD) data; (4) data for incomplete and complete avulsions are reported separately; (5) patients are treated with microvascular revascularization or replantation. Survival rates, TAM, and 2PD data were recorded and a weighted mean of each was calculated.
Results
Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 32 studies all reported survival outcomes, 13 studies reported TAM (MCP+PIP+DIP), and 9 studies reported sensibility. The mean survival rate for complete finger and thumb avulsions undergoing replantation was 66% (n=442). The mean TAM of complete finger avulsions after successful replantation was 174 degrees (n=75), with a large number of patients in the included studies having arthrodesis of the DIP joint. The mean 2PD in patients after replantation was 10 mm (n=32).
Conclusions
We found that functional outcomes of sensibility and range of motion after replantation of finger avulsion injuries are better than what is historically cited in the literature. The results of this systematic review challenge the practice of performing routine revision amputation of all complete finger avulsion injuries.
“…We extracted TAM data from 13 studies (4,5,9–11,15–17,19,23,33,34,39), and we extracted static 2PD data from 9 studies (4,5,9,11,15–17,34,39). All studies that reported TAM and 2PD data also reported survival outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two studies (16,23) explicitly stated that replantation was attempted on a total of four patients having complete avulsion injuries involving the proximal phalanx or PIP joint. The remainder of the studies did not specify the number of patients undergoing replantation, if any, who had injury proximal to the FDS insertion (5,9,19,33). In addition, studies by Kay et al (10) and Sanmartin et al (33) each reported no functional difference based on the level of injury in relation to the PIP joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As surgeons continued to push the boundaries of microsurgery, novel techniques were proposed to manage the difficulties of salvaging avulsed digits. Reconstruction of vessels with long vein grafts (4,5), venous flow-through flaps (6), or transfer of vessels from adjacent fingers (7,8) enhanced survival of the avulsed digit. Several classification systems (9–11) have evolved to categorize patients according to anticipated treatment and functional outcome (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbaniak has advocated for revision amputation to treat complete finger avulsion injuries (9,14). However, recent studies presenting functional outcomes after replantation of finger avulsion injuries have challenged this recommendation, with some authors achieving reasonable total active motion (TAM) approaching 200 degrees or greater after replantation of digital avulsion injuries (4,5,15,18–20). …”
Purpose
Recent studies presenting functional outcomes after replantation of finger avulsion injuries have challenged the historic practice of performing revision amputation for all complete finger avulsion injuries. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the English literature of replantation of finger avulsion injuries to provide best evidence of survival rates and functional outcomes.
Methods
A Medline literature search yielded 1398 studies using keywords of traumatic amputation or replantation with limitation to humans and finger injuries. Inclusion criteria required that studies meet the following requirements: (1) primary data are presented; (2) the study includes at least five cases with either complete or incomplete finger avulsion injuries at or distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint; (3) the study presents survival rates, total active arc of motion (TAM), or static two-point discrimination (2PD) data; (4) data for incomplete and complete avulsions are reported separately; (5) patients are treated with microvascular revascularization or replantation. Survival rates, TAM, and 2PD data were recorded and a weighted mean of each was calculated.
Results
Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 32 studies all reported survival outcomes, 13 studies reported TAM (MCP+PIP+DIP), and 9 studies reported sensibility. The mean survival rate for complete finger and thumb avulsions undergoing replantation was 66% (n=442). The mean TAM of complete finger avulsions after successful replantation was 174 degrees (n=75), with a large number of patients in the included studies having arthrodesis of the DIP joint. The mean 2PD in patients after replantation was 10 mm (n=32).
Conclusions
We found that functional outcomes of sensibility and range of motion after replantation of finger avulsion injuries are better than what is historically cited in the literature. The results of this systematic review challenge the practice of performing routine revision amputation of all complete finger avulsion injuries.
“…Waikakul et al (2000) also encountered statistically significant better results in terms of survival when both arteries were reconstructed. Nevertheless, Hyza et al (2007) stated that, with only one artery and two veins anastomosed, the survival rate in their case series of six cases was 100%. Sufficient de´bridement of the stretched vascular structures always leads to significant artery and vein defects.…”
A rare case of ring avulsion injury with avulsion of both digital arteries yet without external soft tissue, tendon or skeletal injury in a 29 year-old man is reported.
Urgent replantation of head and neck amputated parts allow patients to recover in a timely manner and to decrease the need for secondary reconstructive procedures. The significant rate of success is a strong argument in favor of promoting access to care for replantation of craniofacial parts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.